Table 2.
Genetic comparisons between strain RST and R. pseudosolanacearum LMG 9673T, and type species in the genus Ralstonia.
| Strain | RST | R. pseudosolanacearum LMG 9673T | G + C contentb | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16S rRNAsa | ANIbb | ANImb | DDH1c | DDH2c | DDH3c | 16S rRNAa | ANIbb | ANImb | DDH1c | DDH2c | DDH3c | ||
| RST | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 99.50 | 95.30 | 96.15 | 73.40 | 66.20 | 74.50 | 67.10 |
| R. pseudosolanacearum LMG 9673T | 99.50 | 95.23 | 96.14 | 73.40 | 66.20 | 74.50 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 66.60 |
| R. syzygii subsp. syzygii LMG 10661T | 97.18 | 91.18 | 93.00 | 51.40 | 48.80 | 51.10 | 96.97 | 90.96 | 92.73 | 47.70 | 47.30 | 47.50 | 66.50 |
| R. syzygii subsp. indonesiensis LMG 27703T | 99.50 | 91.41 | 92.84 | 65.70 | 47.50 | 63.00 | 99.28 | 90.93 | 92.50 | 58.60 | 45.60 | 56.50 | 66.30 |
| R. solanacearum K60-1T | 99.28 | 89.69 | 91.64 | 58.60 | 42.20 | 55.40 | 99.57 | 89.62 | 91.56 | 57.60 | 41.80 | 54.50 | 66.40 |
| R. mannitolilytica LMG 6866T | 97.40 | 83.00 | 86.72 | 36.30 | 27.70 | 33.30 | 97.33 | 83.00 | 86.77 | 35.10 | 27.60 | 32.30 | 65.80 |
| R. soli 21MJYT02-11T | 97.62 | 83.08 | 86.87 | 33.00 | 27.60 | 30.70 | 97.48 | 83.20 | 86.87 | 31.60 | 27.70 | 29.60 | 64.10 |
| R. insidiosa CCUG 46789T | 97.26 | 82.80 | 86.46 | 34.00 | 26.90 | 31.30 | 97.33 | 82.82 | 86.49 | 32.30 | 26.90 | 30.00 | 63.70 |
| R. wenshanensis 56D2T | 97.69 | 82.49 | 86.36 | 35.40 | 26.70 | 32.30 | 97.55 | 82.56 | 86.38 | 33.20 | 26.70 | 30.60 | 63.70 |
| R. pickettii K-288T | 97.26 | 82.57 | 86.27 | 36.60 | 26.60 | 33.10 | 97.11 | 82.69 | 86.26 | 35.20 | 26.50 | 32.10 | 63.90 |
| R. chuxiongensis 21YRMH01-3T | 97.26 | 82.26 | 86.22 | 34.70 | 26.30 | 31.70 | 97.11 | 82.37 | 86.22 | 32.80 | 26.40 | 30.20 | 63.50 |
| R. mojiangensis 21MJYT02-10T | 97.40 | 82.36 | 86.24 | 35.20 | 26.20 | 32.00 | 97.26 | 82.36 | 86.28 | 33.10 | 26.30 | 30.40 | 63.60 |
Data are presented as a percentage.
The 16S rRNA sequence similarities were calculated using the Clustal Omega multiple alignment package in the EMBL-EBI database (Sievers and Higgins, 2021).
The ANI (ANIb and ANIm) and overall G + C content values were generated using the online service JSpeciesWS (Richter et al., 2015).
The dDDH values were yielded using the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (Meier-Kolthoff et al., 2022). 16S rRNAs = 16S rRNA sequence similarity. DDH1 = formula 1. DDH2 = formula 2. DDH3 = formula 3.