Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 5;82:103022. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103022

Table 1.

Depression from 2016 to 2020 by sample characteristics at baseline, China.

n (%)/Mean (SD) Depression in 2016
Depression in 2018
Depression in 2020
Mean (SD) p valuea Mean (SD) p valuea Mean (SD) p valuea
Total 9819 (100.00%) 4.90 (3.90) 5.36 (3.83) 5.53 (4.08)
Sociodemographic factors
 Gender <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Female 5037 (51.30%) 5.24 (3.96) 5.77 (3.90) 5.89 (4.11)
 Male 4782 (48.70%) 4.53 (3.80) 4.94 (3.71) 5.14 (4.02)
 Age groups (years) <0.001 <0.001 0.003
 16-29 2042 (20.80%) 4.39 (3.23) 4.99 (3.36) 5.21 (3.64)
 30-39 1704 (17.35%) 4.82 (3.48) 5.50 (3.47) 5.52 (3,67)
 40-49 2211 (22.52%) 5.14 (4.10) 5.62 (4.01) 5.70 (4.16)
 50-59 1988 (20.25%) 5.00 (4.09) 5.34 (4.01) 5.58 (4.32)
 60-69 1444 (14.71%) 5.15 (4.41) 5.40 (4.13) 5.59 (4.47)
 ≥70 430 (4.38%) 5.03 (4.39) 5.25 (4.27) 5.74 (4.56)
 Ethnicity <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Non-Han 857 (8.73%) 5.51 (4.15) 5.90 (3.79) 6.14 (4.22)
 Han 8962 (91.27%) 4.84 (3.87) 5.31 (3.83) 5.47 (4.06)
 Marital status <0.001 0.1052 0.2829
 Single/divorced/widowed 1689 (17.20%) 5.21 (4.04) 5.50 (3.91) 5.62 (4.08)
 Cohabit/married 8130 (82.80%) 4.83 (3.87) 5.33 (3.81) 5.51 (4.08)
Socioeconomic factors
 Education <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 No formal education 1904 (19.39%) 5.89 (4.54) 6.38 (4.49) 6.45 (4.63)
 Primary school 2084 (21.22%) 5.16 (4.01) 5.41 (3.85) 5.82 (4.18)
 Junior secondary school 3124 (31.82%) 4.60 (3.65) 5.20 (3.63) 5.26 (3.89)
 Senior secondary school 1575 (16.04%) 4.38 (3.58) 4.76 (3.39) 4.98 (3.69)
 College or above 1132 (11.53%) 4.28 (3.22) 4.84 (3.34) 4.92 (3.62)
 Equivalized household income <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Q1 (lowest income group) 1965 (20.01%) 5.81 (4.31) 6.36 (4.22) 6.38 (4.45)
 Q2 1996 (20.33%) 5.16 (4.01) 5.65 (3.93) 5.87 (4.24)
 Q3 1937 (19.73%) 4.80 (3.77) 5.15 (3.60) 5.36 (3.97)
 Q4 1959 (19.95%) 4.35 (3.59) 4.88 (3.55) 5.02 (3.82)
 Q5 (highest income group) 1962 (19.98%) 4.35 (3.57) 4.76 (3.57) 4.99 (3.70)
 Employment status 0.238 0.060 0.151
 Non-employed (unemployed/students/not in labor market) 2522 (25.68%) 4.98 (4.16) 5.24 (3.87) 5.42 (4.11)
 Employed 7297 (74.32%) 4.87 (3.81) 5.41 (3.82) 5.56 (4.07)
Place of residence
 Area <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Urban 5048 (51.41%) 4.75 (3.79) 5.05 (3.65) 5.22 (3.93)
 Rural 4771 (48.59%) 5.06 (4.01) 5.70 (3.99) 5.85 (4.21)
 Region <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Eastern 3500 (35.65%) 4.62 (3.70) 5.03 (3.76) 5.12 (3.95)
 Middle 2858 (29.11%) 4.92 (3.91) 5.39 (3.77) 5.60 (4.04)
 Western 2398 (24.42%) 5.29 (4.05) 5.86 (3.80) 6.02 (4.18)
 Northeastern 1063 (10.83%) 4.85 (4.09) 5.26 (4.15) 5.57 (4.27)
Lifestyle factors
 Smoking 0.041 0.002 0.057
 No 7184 (73.16%) 4.95 (3.89) 5.44 (3.82) 5.57 (4.05)
 Yes 2635 (26.84%) 4.76 (3.93) 5.16 (3.85) 5.40 (4.15)
 Drinking <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 No 8287 (84.40%) 4.96 (3.90) 5.43 (3.85) 5.61 (4.11)
 Yes 1532 (15.60%) 4.54 (3.86) 4.97 (3.73) 5.05 (3.89)
 Exercise per week (times) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 0 5599 (57.0%) 5.01 (3.93) 5.60 (3.90) 5.73 (4.13)
 1-2 907 (9.2%) 5.10 (3.71) 5.70 (3.69) 5.59 (3.89)
 3-5 1031 (10.50%) 4.64 (3.56) 4.93 (3.56) 5.13 (3.85)
 ≥6 2282 (23.24%) 4.66 (4.04) 4.85 (3.77) 5.17 (4.09)
Physical discomfort <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 No 7123 (72.54%) 4.20 (3.43) 4.91 (3.59) 5.10 (3.83)
 Yes 2696 (27.46%) 6.75 (4.44) 6.57 (4.18) 6.66 (4.48)
Cognitive social capital
 Generalized trust <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Low 4236 (43.14%) 5.59 (4.15) 5.88 (4.05) 6.08 (4.24)
 High 5583 (56.86%) 4.37 (3.62) 4.97 (3.61) 5.11 (3.90)
 Trust in neighbors (0–10) b 6.66 (2.15) <0.001 <0.001
 Low (0–5) 3498 (35.62%) 5.64 (4.21) <0.001 5.90 (4.05) 6.13 (4.29)
 High (6–10) 6321 (64.38%) 4.48 (3.65) 5.07 (3.67) 5.19 (3.92)
 Trust in local government officials (0–10) b 4.98 (2.64) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Low (0–5) 6266 (63.82%) 5.24 (3.98) 5.59 (3.87) 5.77 (4.09)
 High (6–10) 3553 (36.18%) 4.29 (3.67) 4.97 (3.72) 5.09 (4.02)
Reciprocity <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Low 2695 (27.45%) 5.85 (4.23) 6.01 (4.04) 6.23 (4.29)
 High 7124 (72.55%) 4.54 (3.70) 5.12 (3.72) 5.26 (3.97)
a

Two-sample t-tests or ANOVA.

b

We divided trust scores into two groups to compare CES-D-8 score between groups in descriptive statistics. We still used the original trust score in regression analysis.