Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 22;10:1036087. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1036087

Table 2.

Estimated change rate of ocular biometry and choroid thickness in Chinese medical students using linear mixed model.

Emmetropia (n = 20) Mild to moderate myopia (n = 212) High myopia (n = 59) P-value † (Mild to moderate myopia vs. Emmetropia) P-value (High myopia vs. Emmetropia) p-value (High myopia vs. Mild to moderate myopia)
Change rate (95% CI) *
Ocular biometry
Spherical equivalent, D/y −0.11 (−0.19, −0.03) −0.11 (−0.13, −0.08) −0.14 (−0.18, −0.09) >0.999 >0.999 0.902
Axial length, mm/y 0.04 (0.01, 0.07) 0.02 (0.01, 0.03) 0.04 (0.02, 0.05) 0.821 >0.999 0.276
Intraocular pressure, mmHg/y −0.65 (−1.05, −0.26) −0.43 (−0.55, −0.31) −0.60 (−0.83, −0.37) 0.897 >0.999 0.602
Lens thickness, mm/y 0.01 (−0.01, 0.03) 0.02 (0.01, 0.02) 0.01 (0.003, 0.02) >0.999 >0.999 >0.999
K1 (horizontal), D/y −0.03 (−0.09, 0.03) 0.004 (−0.02, 0.01) −0.04 (−0.08, −0.01) >0.999 >0.999 0.225
K2 (vertical), D/y 0.01 (−0.07, 0.09) −0.02 (−0.04, 0.01) 0.002 (−0.05, 0.04) >0.999 >0.999 >0.999
Choroid thickness reduction, μm/y
Subfoveal −10.46 (−15.62, −5.30) −0.51 (−2.10, 1.07) −0.93 (−3.93, 2.07) <0.001 0.005 >0.999
Nasal, 1.5 mm −4.52 (−9.17, 0.12) −0.24 (−1.67, 1.19) −1.24 (−3.95, 1.46) 0.252 0.692 >0.999
Nasal, 3 mm −4.26 (−7.95, −0.57) 0.17 (−0.96, 1.31) −0.86 (−3.01, 1.29) 0.074 0.356 >0.999
Superior, 1.5 mm −7.67 (−12.46, −2.88) 0.32 (−1.15, 1.79) −1.09 (−3.88, 1.70) 0.006 0.060 >0.999
Superior, 3 mm −5.49 (−9.90, −1.07) 0.86 (−0.49, 2.22) 0.63 (−1.94, 3.20) 0.022 0.057 >0.999
Temporal, 1.5 mm −10.37 (−15.16, −5.59) −0.45 (−1.92, 1.02) −2.36 (−5.15, 0.43) <0.001 0.014 0.701
Temporal, 3 mm −6.95 (−11.73, −2.18) −0.89 (−2.36, 0.57) −1.06 (−3.84, 1.72) 0.053 0.110 >0.999
Inferior, 1.5 mm −9.72 (−14.35, −5.09) −0.74 (−2.17, 0.68) −2.00 (−4.70, 0.69) <0.001 0.015 >0.999
Inferior, 3 mm −8.74 (−12.72, −4.76) −0.10 (−1.32, 1.13) −1.00 (−3.32, 1.32) <0.001 0.003 >0.999

* Shown are estimated rate of change and 95% confidence interval.

p value was calculated for interaction between group and follow-up in mixed linear model and has been adjusted for multiple comparisions to control an overall type I error of 0.05 using Bonferroni Correction.