Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 5.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Nephrol. 2021 Jun 21;52(6):487–495. doi: 10.1159/000516575

Table 2.

Nephrology fellows’ ratings of the frequency and degree of moral distress caused by each situation presented in the adapted Moral Distress Scales-Revised (n = 121)

Clinical situation in questionnaire Frequency of situation*, n (%) Severity of moral distress*, n (%)
never (0) rarely to sometimes (1–2) often to frequently (3–4) none (0) mild to low moderate (1–2) moderate to severe (3–4)
(1) Dialysis decision-making
(a) Witness other health care providers provide overly optimistic information regarding the benefits of acute dialysis in critically ill patients 9 (7.6) 45 (38.1) 64 (54.2) 2 (1.7) 39 (33.9) 74 (64.3)
(b) Witness other health care providers provide overly optimistic information regarding the benefits of chronic dialysis 13 (11.0) 54 (45.8) 51 (43.2) 1 (0.8) 40 (35.1) 73 (64.0)
(c) Dialyze patients in a situation in which they or their family members have not been given adequate information to ensure an informed consent 35 (30.4) 64 (55.7) 16 (13.9) 1 (0.9) 30 (26.3) 83 (72.8)
(2) Futility of dialysis
(a) Initiate renal replacement therapy when you think it is futile 10 (8.6) 48 (41.0) 59 (50.4) 3 (2.6) 24 (20.9) 88 (76.5)
(b) Follow family’s wishes to continue dialysis even though you believe it is not in the best interest of a patient who does not have the capacity to make his/her own decision 4 (3.5) 50 (43.1) 62 (53.4) 0 (0.00) 27 (23.7) 87 (76.3)
(c) Continue to provide renal replacement therapy for a hopelessly ill patient when no one will make a decision to withdraw support 12 (10.3) 52 (44.8) 52 (44.8) 0 (0) 22 (19.3) 92 (80.7)
(d) Withhold dialysis per family request in a patient unable to make his/her own choices when you feel providing dialysis is appropriate 67 (57.8) 39 (33.6) 10 (8.6) 4 (3.6) 30 (26.8) 78 (69.6)
(3) Institutional or fellowship programs’ culture
(a) Feel pressure to see and write a note on a patient when you feel that your input will not change management 12 (10.3) 47 (40.5) 57 (49.1) 11 (9.6) 54 (47) 50 (43.5)
(b) Have too high a patient census such that you are unable to provide quality care 11 (9.4) 56 (47.9) 50 (42.7) 2 (1.74) 27 (23.5) 86 (75)
(c) Do procedures with inadequate supervision 91 (78.5) 18 (15.5) 7 (6.0) 13 (11.4) 18 (15.8) 83 (72.8)
(4) Interdisciplinary communication
(a) Follow the primary physician’s request not to discuss the patient’s prognosis with the patient or family 63 (54.3) 43 (37.1) 10 (8.6) 3 (2.6) 34 (29.8) 77 (67.6)
(b) Witness diminished quality of care due to poor team communication 12 (10.3) 77 (62.4) 32 (27.4) 0 (0.00) 32 (28.1) 82 (71.9)
(c) Feel pressure to withhold your opinion when you disagree with the primary medical team’s plan of care 25 (21.4) 61 (57.3) 25 (21.4) 1 (0.8) 40 (34.8) 74 (64.4)
(5) Power dynamics
(a) Provide recommendations for patient care that you do not agree with based on your attending physician’s opinion 24 (20.5) 77 (65.8) 16 (13.6) 4 (3.5) 47 (41.2) 63 (55.3)
(b) Take no action when a physician or nurse colleague has made a medical error and does not report it 75 (65.8) 31 (27.2) 8 (7.0) 3 (2.7) 28 (25.1) 82 (72.6)
(c) Take no action about an observed ethical issue because the involved staff member or someone in a position of authority requests that you do nothing 82 (71.3) 28 (24.3) 5 (4.3) 1 (0.89) 13 (11.6) 98 (87.5)
*

The number of responses for each item is <142 as some respondents did not answer all the questions. Moreover, some participants responded to the frequency item but did not respond to the severity item.