Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 5;21:37. doi: 10.1186/s12959-023-00483-6

Table 2.

Clinical Outcomes of RFA vs. no RFA in NVAF patients taking DOACs

No RFA (n=3476) RFA (n=2661) OR(95%CI) P value Adjusted OR(95%CI)b P value
Total bleeding, n(%) 405(11.7) 265(9.9) 0.839(0.712-0.988) <0.001 0.901(0.746-1.087) 0.275
Major Bleeding, n(%) 98(2.8) 15(0.6) 0.195(0.113-0.337) 0.035 0.278(0.150-0.515) <0.001
Thrombosis, n(%) 58(1.7) 25(0.9) 0.559(0.349-0.896) 0.014 0.535(0.316-0.908) 0.020
All-cause death, n(%) 178(5.1) 73(2.7) 0.523(0.396-0.690) <0.001 0.842(0.611-1.160) 0.293
Composite outcomea, n(%) 624(18.0) 355(15.7) 0.704(0.611-0.810) <0.001 0.835(0.710-0.982) 0.029

NVAF Non-valvular atrial fibrillation, RFA Radiofrequency ablation, OR Odds ratio, 95%CI 95% Confidence interval

aComposite outcome included all-cause death, thrombosis and total bleeding

bAdjust for radiofrequency ablation, sex (male), age, body mass index, smoking, alcohol, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, coronary artery disease, renal insufficiency, hypohepatia, vascular disease, total bilirubin, ghrelin, glutamic aminotransferase, creatinine, platelet count, hemoglobin, antiplatelet agents, proton pump inhibitors, H2 receptor antagonists, statins, amiodarone, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, digoxin, calcium blockers, diltiazem