Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 18;27(3):629–646. doi: 10.1177/13623613221111207

Table 2.

Results of likelihood-ratio tests to determine the best-fitting model by group and condition.

Condition Group Comparison DF F P The better fitting model The best-fitting model
Speech ASD Linear and Quadratic 1 0.71 0.40 Linear Cubic model
Linear and Cubic 2 10.48 <0.001 *** Cubic
Cubic and Quartic 1 1.18 0.28 Cubic
Non-ASD Linear and Quadratic 1 1.26 0.26 Linear Cubic model
Linear and Cubic 2 26.00 <0.001 *** Cubic
Cubic and Quartic 1 0.71 0.40 Cubic
Complex tone ASD Linear and Quadratic 1 0.15 0.70 Linear Quartic model
Linear and Cubic 2 2.68 0.07 Linear
Linear and Quartic 3 3.07 0.03 * Quartic
Non-ASD Linear and Quadratic 1 2.20 0.14 Linear Cubic model
Linear and Cubic 2 10.43 <0.001 *** Cubic
Cubic and Quartic 1 2.30 0.13 Cubic

ASD: autism spectrum disorder.

*

p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.