Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 4;24:132. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05246-8

Table 1.

ICOR runtime comparable to the BFC, HFC, and URC approaches and significantly faster than ERC approach

Average Time (n. seq = 40) (n. trials = 3) Time Per Seq Time Per Codon Time per NT
ERC 275,587% (749597 ms) (750.517 s, 749.821 s, 748.455 s) 18,739.9 ms 1332.50 ms 444.166 ms
ICOR 288% (782 ms) (0.772 s, 0.807 s, 0.766 s) 19.5 ms 1.39 ms 0.463 ms
BFC 283% (771 ms) (0.761 s, 0.764 s, 0.787 s) 19.3 ms 1.37 ms 0.456 ms
HFC 84% (229 ms) (0.233 s, 0.226 s, 0.228 s) 5.7 ms 0.40 ms 0.136 ms
URC 100% (272 ms) (0.271 s, 0.274 s, 0.272 s) 6.8 ms 0.48 ms 0.161 ms

Three trials were conducted with the score being an average of these three times measured to the third significant figure in milliseconds

Optimization run time is displayed with a normalized percentage to the URC approach because it represents the most naïve codon selection