Table 3.
Results of stratified analysis, reporting log2 Fold Change values and P-values.
| miR-99b-3p |
miR-197-3p |
miR-374b-5p |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| log2 Fold Change | P | log2 Fold Change | P | log2 Fold Change | P | |
| CD vs control | -0.884 | 0.0343 | -0.881 | 0.0132 | 0.051 | 0.3991 |
| LI vs control | -0.175 | 0.2993 | -0.510 | 0.3089 | 0.463 | 0.1217 |
| patient vs control | -0.808 | 0.0471 | -0.819 | 0.0326 | 0.276 | 0.3943 |
| CD-LI vs control | -0.842 | 0.1555 | -1.198 | 0.0196 | 0.438 | 0.3761 |
| CD+LI vs control | -0.932 | 0.0264 | -0.849 | 0.0427 | -0.683 | 0.2380 |
| CD-TI vs control | -0.811 | 0.0801 | -0.842 | 0.0323 | -0.056 | 0.3722 |
| CD+TI vs control | -1.548 | 0.0363 | -1.311 | 0.0254 | -1.015 | 0.1610 |
| CD-DH vs control | -0.986 | 0.0222 | -0.868 | 0.0152 | -0.022 | 0.2690 |
| CD+DH vs control | -0.311 | 0.4169 | -1.123 | 0.1309 | 1.523 | 0.1828 |
| CD vs LI | 0.710 | 0.0790 | 0.364 | 0.0954 | 0.411 | 0.0743 |
| CD-LI vs LI | -0.664 | 0.2695 | -0.680 | 0.0852 | -0.025 | 0.2494 |
| CD+LI vs LI | -0.333 | 0.0487 | -0.561 | 0.1773 | -1.146 | 0.0384 |
| CD-TI vs LI | 0.633 | 0.1270 | 0.332 | 0.1627 | 0.194 | 0.1459 |
| CD+TI vs LI | 1.373 | 0.0706 | 0.800 | 0.0815 | 1.153 | 0.0529 |
| CD-DH vs LI | 1.751 | 0.0521 | 0.356 | 0.1009 | 0.485 | 0.0402 |
| CD+DH vs LI | 0.808 | 0.500 | 0.611 | 0.2304 | -1.062 | 0.3605 |
| CD+LI vs CD-LI | -0.092 | 0.3195 | 0.347 | 0.2509 | 0.463 | 0.1217 |
| CD+TI vs CD-TI | -0.737 | 0.0994 | -0.468 | 0.2612 | -0.960 | 0.2232 |
| CD+DH vs CD-DH | 0.674 | 0.1047 | -0.255 | 0.4283 | 1.545 | 0.0940 |
vs – versus, CD – celiac disease, LI – lactose intolerance, TI – thyroid impairment, DH – dermatitis herpetiformis. In bold – P-values lower than 0.05.