Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 5;2023(4):CD015016. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015016.pub3

Bouwmeester 2001.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: Double‐blind, randomized clinical trial
Study grouping: Continuous morphine versus three‐hourly placebo or intermittent morphine with placebo infusion
Participants Baseline Characteristics
Inclusion criteria: Children aged 0 to 3 years, admitted to the pediatric surgical intensive care unit after non‐cardiac thoracic and abdominal surgery
Exclusion criteria: Author excluded patients if they had received analgesic or sedative drugs less than 6 hours before surgery, if they were receiving neuromuscular blockade or if they suffered from hepatic, renal or neurological disorders or altered muscle tone.
Pretreatment: Anesthesia was induced with thiopentone or by inhalation of halothane in oxygen. Fentanyl 5 mcg/kg was given before orotracheal intubation, which was facilitated with atracurium 0.5‐1 mcg/kg or suxamethonium 2 mcg/kg.
Interventions Intervention Characteristics
Continuous infusion versus bolus administration
  • Dose regimen: Two groups (continuous morphine versus intermittent morphine)

  • Description of procedure: One group received continuous morphine (10 mcg/kg/h) while the other group received a continuous placebo infusion combined with three‐hourly intravenous doses of 30 mcg/kg. All participants received an intravenous loading dose of morphine (100 mcg/kg).

Outcomes Pain assessed with validated methods during the administration of selected drugs
  • Outcome type: Continuous outcome


Nurses performed regular assessments before surgery (baseline) and every 3 h up to 36 h after surgery. Nursing interventions included pain assessment using a VAS and the COMFORT scale. 
Identification Sponsorship source: The study was supported by the Dutch Research Council and the Sophia Foundation for Medical Research. 
Country: The Netherlands
Setting: Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
Comments: None
Authors names: Nancy J. Bouwmeester, K.J.S. Anand, Monique van Dijk, Wim C. J. Hop, F. Boomsma, and Dick Tibboel
Institution: Department of Anesthesiology and Pediatric Surgery, Sophia Children's Hospital
Email: Not provided
Address: Sophia Children's Hospital, University Hospital Rotterdam, Dr Molewaterplein 60, 3015 GJ Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "The pharmacists prepared all study drugs, and the strata‐specific schedules for randomization".
Computer‐generated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Clinical staff blinded to allocation
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk "Pharmacists prepared all study drugs, and the strata‐specific schedules for randomization and the clinical staff were blinded to the study group allocation until data collection was complete."
Blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk "Clinical staff were blinded to the study group allocation until data collection was complete".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk "All enrolled patients were included in an intention‐to‐treat analysis. Nine patients dropped out during the study (five in CM, four in IM) because of the loss of arterial access (seven), the need for neuromuscular blockade (one) and one postoperative death 3 h after surgery."
N in the figures did not match the size of each experimental group and reasons were not clearly stated.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No registry stated so unable to compare to protocol
Other bias Low risk None