Vaughn 1996.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: Double‐blind, randomized clinical trial Study grouping: Fentanyl continuous infusion versus bolus dosing every 2 hours |
|
Participants |
Baseline Characteristics Inclusion criteria: Infants between 36 and 52 weeks postmenstrual age at the time of studies, who were admitted to the neonate intensive care unit. Patients underwent a surgical procedure after which at least 24 hours of narcotic analgesia was likely to be needed. Exclusion criteria: Patients that required assisted ventilation before surgery were not eligible. Pretreatment: None |
|
Interventions |
Intervention Characteristics Continuous infusion versus bolus administration
|
|
Outcomes |
Pain assessed with validated methods during the administration of selected drugs
After initiating the study medications, an observational pain assessment was performed. The observational pain assessment tool used was an adaptation of the Infant Pain Scale (IPS). Duration of mechanical ventilation (days)
Time to extubation |
|
Identification |
Sponsorship source: Supported by the General Clinical Research Centers Program, National Center for Research Resources (NIH) Country: United States of America Setting: Neonate Intensive Care Unit Comments: None Authors names: Philip R. Vaughn, Susan F. Townsend, Elizabeth H. Thilo, Shirley McKenzie, Susan Moreland, Kerry Kawato Institution: Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Department of Pharmacy, The Children's Hospital Email: Not provided Address: Pediatrics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 E Ninth Ave, BOX B‐195, Denver, CO, 80262 |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "Enrolled patients were randomly assigned to receive fentanyl by either continuous infusion (C) beginning at 1 pg/kg/h, or bolus dosing (B) with a starting dose of 2 kg every 2 hours, thus providing equivalent cumulative dosing over time." Not specified |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described in paper |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "Caregivers were unaware of the patient’s group assignment (i.e. the caregivers did not know which of the two syringes contained the fentanyl)." Blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | "Any intervention to support the patient was recorded by the bedside nurse. Apnea was determined by impedance pneumography and direct observation." Not stated whether these nurses were blinded |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "A description of the patients enrolled in both phases of the study is shown in Table 2." No concern |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No registry reported so unable to compare to protocol |
Other bias | Unclear risk | "A significant limitation of the study is demonstrated by the larger proportion of patients who remained intubated and ventilated in phase 2 (6 of 13) compared with phase 1 (1 of 7). The study design did not incorporate a systematic approach to weaning ventilator support, and therefore interpretation of this observation is difficult." See quote |
APS: Acute Pain Service CM: continuous morphine COI: continuous opioid infusion CS: COMFORT scale FLACC: Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale IM: intramuscular IPS: Infant Pain Scale i.v.: intravenous PNCA: parent‐ or nurse‐controlled analgesia VAS: visual analogue scale