Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Emotion. 2022 Oct 6;23(5):1506–1512. doi: 10.1037/emo0001125

Table 2.

Full regression results for focal hypotheses (N= 120). Maternal recognition of happiness (Model 1), but not fear (Model 2) predicted observed sensitive caregiving, controlling for a priori covariates.

β p ΔR2
Model 1 Happiness
Step 1 Infant negative mood → Sensitivity −.14 .295 .01
Neutral d’ → Sensitivity −.00 .994
Step 2 Happy d’ → Sensitivity .30 .002 .08

Infant negative mood with Neutral d’ .00 .991
Infant negative mood with Happy d’ −.08 .401
Neutral d’ with Happy d’ .31 <.001

Model 2 Fear
Step 1 Infant negative mood → Sensitivity −.14 .295 .01
Neutral d’ → Sensitivity −.00 .994
Step 2 Fear d’ → Sensitivity .15 .123 .02

Infant negative mood with Neutral d’ .00 .966
Infant negative mood with Fear d’ .06 .575
Neutral d’ with Fear d’ .16 .080

Note. Models were run in two steps in MPlus Version 7 using FIML. Boldface indicates significant coefficients. Mothers’ performance on the emotion recognition task was measured during the newborn period; d’ scores were calculated as Z(hit rate) – Z(false alarm rate) for each emotion. Maternal sensitivity = mean of scores for Ainsworth’s (1969) sensitivity–insensitivity and cooperation–interference scales, coded from video recordings of the mother–infant free play session at 5 months postpartum.