Table 3.
Regression coefficients, standard errors, and model summary information for the influence of mindfulness in a model of social media addiction.
Antecedent | Consequent | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 (Attention control) | Model 2 (FOMO) | Model 3 (Social media addiction) | |||||||||
Coefficient | SE | p | Coefficient | SE | p | Coefficient | SE | p | |||
Gender | 0.98 | 0.60 | 0.11 | −2.09 | 0.89 | 0.02 | 1.25 | 0.96 | 0.19 | ||
Age | 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.51 | −0.06 | 0.30 | 0.83 | −0.16 | 0.32 | 0.61 | ||
Left-behind child | 0.42 | 0.55 | 0.44 | −1.98 | 0.81 | 0.02 | −1.31 | 0.87 | 0.13 | ||
Residence | −0.31 | 0.34 | 0.37 | −1.38 | 0.51 | <0.001 | −0.30 | 0.54 | 0.58 | ||
Mindfulness | 0.22 | 0.03 | <0.001 | −0.31 | 0.04 | <0.001 | −0.30 | 0.05 | <0.001 | ||
Attention control | - | - | - | −0.30 | 0.07 | <0.001 | −0.19 | 0.08 | 0.01 | ||
FOMO | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.70 | 0.05 | <0.001 | ||
Constant | 34.32 | 4.23 | <0.001 | 95.83 | 6.68 | <0.001 | 40.20 | 8.65 | <0.001 | ||
R2 = 0.17 | R2 = 0.26 | R2 = 0.52 | |||||||||
F (4, 441) = 22.07, p < 0.001 | F (5, 440) = 29.58, p < 0.001 | F (6, 439) = 79.08, p < 0.001 |