Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 9;14(1):5–16. doi: 10.1177/19476035221147680

Table 6.

Subgroup Analyses for Lesion Location.

Author N Follow-Up (Months) Outcome Variable Subgroup 1 Subgroup 2 Mean Subgroup 1 Mean Subgroup 2 Results
Asik et al.30 90 68.0 Lysholm Oxford Weightbearing surface Non-weightbearing surface 26.8 ± 5.3
16.2 ± 2.7
37.3 ± 6.4
23.2 ± 2.4
r = 0.658
r = 0.618
P ≤ 0.001
De Windt et al.33 56 34.0 VAS
KOOS Lysholm
Patellar or medial lesion Other Not reported Not reported n.s.
Gobbi et al.35 61 181.2 IKDC Lysholm KOOS Medial condyle Lateral condyle Not reported (better) Not reported (worse) P ≤ 0.05
Kreuz et al.38 70 36.0 ICRS Modified Cincinnati Lesion on femoral condyles or tibia Lesion on trochlea or patella Not reported Not reported Defects on trochlea/patella in correlation with deteriorated results:
P ≤ 0.05
Solheim et al.46 120 12-216 Lysholm Non-involvement of the patellofemoral joint Involvement of the patellofemoral joint Not reported Not reported OR = 2.27
P ≤ 0.05

ICRS = International Cartilage Repair Society; OR = odds ratio; KOOS = Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; IKDC = International Knee Documentation Committee; VAS = Visual Analog Scale.