Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 6;5(2):dlad040. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad040

Table 2.

Characteristics and treatment of UTIs in patients with IAI and after cessation of IAI.

IAI, n (%) No IAI, n (%) OR (95% CI) P value
New-onset LUTS 122/169 (72.2) 87/99 (87.9) 0.43 (0.16–1.18) 0.10
Fever 30/207 (14.5) 14/116 (12.1) 1.23 (0.45–3.34) 0.68
UTI caused by classic GNR 101/164 (61.6) 75/102 (73.5) 0.66 (0.31–1.43) 0.29
UTI caused by enterococci 26/164 (15.9) 5/102 (4.9) 4.45 (1.40–12.88) 0.01
MDRO (including ESBL) 22/155 (14.2) 18/99 (18.2) 0.78 (0.28–2.19) 0.64
Hospital admission 30/206 (14.6) 10/116 (8.6) 1.09 (0.34–3.56) 0.88
Necessity for systemic (oral/IV) antibiotics 155/206 (75.2) 107/116 (92.2) 0.33 (0.13–0.86) 0.02

E. coli, Proteus mirabilis and Klebsiella pneumoniae were defined as classic Gram-negative rods. Missing data: new-onset LUTS (n = 55), hospital admission (n = 1), necessity for systemic antibiotics (n = 1). In 54 UTI episodes, no urine culture was performed. ORs were calculated using a logistic mixed effects model with a varying intercept per patient. GNR, Gram-negative rods; LUTS, lower urinary tract symptoms; MDRO, multidrug-resistant organism; UTI, urinary tract infection.