Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 28;103:5087. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v103.5087

Table II.

Screening practices among the specialists evaluated with univariable logistic regression results

Dermatologists (n=103) Rheumatologists (n=94) PCPs (n=102) Total (n=299) ORγ (95% CI) *D vs R; **D vs PCPs
Smoking, n (%) 81 (78.6 86 (91.5) 56 (54.9) 223 (74.6) *OR 0.34 (0.14–0.81)
**OR 3.02 (1.64–5.58)
Obesity, n (%) 56 (54.4) 47 (50.0) 33 (32.4) 136 (45.5) *OR 1.19 (0.68–2.09)
**OR 2.49 (1.41–4.40)
HTN, n (%) 22 (21.4) 34 (36.2) 57 (55.9 113 (37.8) *OR 0.48 (0.26–0.902)
**OR 0.21 (0.12–0.40)
Dyslipidaemia, n (%) 80 (77.7) 92 (97.9) 68 (66.7) 240 (80.3) *OR 0.08 (0.02–0.33)
**OR 1.74 (0.94–3.23)
DM, n (%) 77 (74.8) 87 (92.6) 74 (72.6) 238 (79.6) *OR 0.24 (0.01–0.58)
**OR 1.12 (0.60–2.09)
Global screening, n (%) 21 (20.6) 29 (30.9) 35 (34.3) 85 (28.4) *OR 0.57 (0.3–1.1)
**OR 0.49 (0.26–0.92)
10-year cardiovascular risk calculation, n (%) 12 (11.7) 12 (12.8) 49 (48.0) 73 (24.4) *OR 0.90 (0.38–2.12)
**OR 0.14 (0.07–0.29)

D: dermatologists; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; DM: diabetes mellitus; HTN: hypertension; OR: odds ratio; PCP: primary care physician; R: rheumatologists; γ: univariable logistic regression.