Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 7;53(1):e13862. doi: 10.1111/eci.13862

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Forest plots showing the meta‐analysis of risk factors for cardiac implantable electronic device malfunctions associated with radiation therapy. Panel (A) comparison of neutron‐producing energies versus non‐neutron‐producing energies. Panel (B) comparison of PM/ CRT‐P versus ICD/ CRT‐D. Panel (C) comparison of maximal radiation dose at device >2 Gy versus ≤2 Gy. CI, confidence interval; CRT‐D, cardiac resynchronization therapy and defibrillator; CRT‐P, cardiac resynchronization therapy and pacing; Dmax, maximal radiation dose at device; Gy, greygray; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; PM, pacemakers; RR, risk ratio.