Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 3;33(1):e2393. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2393

TABLE 2.

Summary of evidence – infection outcomes

Study Cases/total Outcome a TTV timepoint Exposure b OR/HR c Other findings
Doberer, '19 127/274 V/B/F ±1 mo pre infection C, 1 1.10 (1.02–1.17) d Similar for infections not requiring hospitalisation, BKV, CMV, opportunistic and extra cellular bacterial infections.
Görzer, '14 13/24 V/B/F 28–76 days pre infection e T, >9.3 11.67 (1.14–119.55) f Case‐control study nested in a small cohort/case series. Peak TTV‐load in patients with infection were higher than in patients without.
Maggi, '18 99/235 CMV viremia D0‐10 post Tx C, 1 1.5 (1.0–2.3) g Lower TTV‐load during 1‐year follow‐up in CMV DNA negative versus positive patients. Proposed threshold of 3.45 log to detect CMV reactivation.
Strassl, '18 31/72 h V/B/F 19–98 days pre infection C, 1 1.23 (1.04–1.45) Proposed threshold of 3.1*10^9 c/ml to predict infection. Higher TTV‐levels in samples taken before (severe/bacterial) infection.
Uhl, '20 40/45 i V/B/F Time of infection C, 1 1.016 (0.876–1.180) The authors also report no association in analyses with the TTV‐load taken 1 month before infection (OR: 1.075, CI: 0.921–1.25) and infection causing fever (OR: 0.932, CI:0.724–1.199).
Fernández‐Ruiz, '19 128/221 j V/B/F/P M1 post Tx T, >3.15 2.88 (1.13–7.36) k Proposed threshold of 3.15 and 4.16 log for infection and immunity related adverse events. Cases did not have higher TTV‐load at D0 and D7, and higher loads at M1, 3 and 6.
Fernández‐Ruiz, '20 54/205 BK viremia M1 post Tx T, >5.01 7.61 (2.09–27.70) l This study contains an additional analysis on the cohort described above, for BKV viremia as outcome.
Gore, '20 40/666 V/B/F (death) Hospital visit (1–20 yr post Tx) m C, 1 1.26 (1.07–1.48) Analysis stratified on time found an association >2 years after Tx. Time to outcome was similar in no, low, medium and high TTV‐load groups.
Jaksch, '18 28/143 n V/B/F 3mo intervals C, Max 5.05 (2.94–8.67) The authors report a higher cumulative frequency of infection in patients with a maximum TTV‐level >9.5 log in a 3 months windowo.
Nordén, '17 nd/98 p V/B/F Time‐varying (M3‐24) C, 1 0.98 (0.87–1.11) Analyses stratified on time (1–3, 3–6, 6–12 and 12–24 months post LuTx) showed no association between TTV‐load and any infection.
van Rijn, '21 105/389 BKV viremia Time‐varying (M0‐12) C, 1 1.03 (1.03–1.04) The authors report similar outcomes in the analysis with CMV viremia as outcome (HR 1.01,CI: 1.01–1.01).
Frye, '19 19/34 V/B/F D0, M2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 M No difference in TTV‐load at D0 and M2, and higher TTV‐load in patients with infection at the other timepoints.
Handala, '19 17/116 BKV viremia D0, M1, 2, 3 M No difference in TTV‐load between patients with and without outcome at the timepoints. No correlation between TTV‐load and BKV DNA load at M3.
Herrmann, '18 23/115 q BKV viruria Hospital visit, 0.6–34 yr post Tx M In LiTx, they found a correlation between BKV DNA in urine and TTV DNA in serum, and higher TTV‐load in patients without BKV viruria than with.
Ruiz, '19 41/63 CMV viremia During and pre infection M Higher TTV‐load and cumulative TTV DNA during and before CMV infection and disease. No correlation between TTV‐load and CMV DNA during infection r .
Solis, '19 28/63 s BKV viremia D0, M1, 3, 6, 12, 24 C, 0.2 t No difference in TTV‐load at any timepoint between patients with and without BKV viremia during 2 year follow‐up, except at 6 months.
a

V: viral, B: bacterial, F: fungal, P: parasitic.

b

TTV exposure C: continuous, and step load increase in Log10. T: TTV load threshold, M: median or mean TTV load compared in patients with and without outcome.

c

OR: odds ratio, HR: hazard ratio.

d

Numbers from analysis with one event per patient.

e

Timing of TTV load sampling in control group is not reported.

f

OR not reported, approximated from reported test accuracy numbers. Large confidence interval due to very small groups.

g

It is unclear whether the reported OR is crude or adjusted for CMV prophylaxis, CMV negative serostatus and tacrolimus level at mo1.

h

Table 1 in the publication reports 22 with infection, the text reports 31 patients with infection and a total of 41 infections. In addition, the analysis allows for multiple outcomes per patient.

i

The analysis allowed for multiple infections per patient, 119 infectious episode occurred during the study period.

j

Sample size of the number of cases and total cohort. The sample size and number of cases at the month 1 timepoint is not reported.

k

Adjusted for delayed graft function and serum albumin at month 1.

l

Reported HR, adjusted for recipient age, hypertensive nephropathy and DCD donor.

m

Start of follow‐up time was set at hospital visit.

n

The authors allowed for multiple events per patients, events occurring within 1 mo were counted as 1 event.

o

Which 3 mo window is used to calculate the cumulative frequency is not reported.

p

The number of patients with outcome is reported only per periodic interval.

q

Only patients with detectable TTV loads were included (115/136).

r

The definition of cumulative DNA is not reported.

s

Cohort composed of 50 BKV viruric patients +16 non BKV‐viraemic patients, of which 63 had detectable TTV loads, and 28 were BKV viremic.

t

No OR reported or numbers from which the OR may be approximated.