Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 3;33(1):e2393. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2393

TABLE 3.

Summary of evidence – rejection outcomes

Study Cases/total Outcome a TTV timepoint Exposure b OR/HR c Other findings
Blatter, ‘18 17/48 d ACR 2wks post Tx T, >median 0.16 (0.01–0.63) e No association found at 6 weeks and 6 months post Tx.
Doberer, ‘19 11/37 BPR 2wks pre biopsy C, 1 0.8 (0.64–1.00) f Similar results in subanalyses without borderline lesions. Proposed threshold of 1.5*10^6 c/ml.
Doberer, ‘20 19/82 BPR Day of biopsy C, 1 0.91 (0.85–0.97) Similar results for different subtypes of rejection.
Görzer, ‘17 20/47 g CLAD Day of CLAD T, >7 0.12 (0.03–0.50) h Proposed threshold of 7.0 log. Similar findings with the TTV‐load taken 50–20 days before CLAD, and lower a TTV‐load found during and before CLAD.
Schiemann, ‘17 46/715 ABMR Day of rejection i C, 1 0.91 (0.87–0.96) j Similar results were found in subanalyses with patients subject to protocol biopsy.
Strassl, ‘19 33/113 BPR ±1.5 mo pre biopsy k C, 1 0.90 (0.84–0.97) Similar results using only the earliest biopsy. Proposed threshold of 6 log to detect rejection.
Fernández‐Ruiz, ‘19 11/221 l AR Before Tx C, 1 0.69 (0.49–0.97) Lower loads were found in patients with versus without outcome.
Jaksch, ‘18 11/143 ACR 3 month intervals C, Min 0.48 (0.26–0.88) m Similar results are shown for CLAD. A higher cumulative frequency of ACR is shown for TTV‐load <7.0 log in a 3 months window n .
Simonetta, ‘17 nd/29 BPAR Before Tx T, Pos 0.01 (0.001–0.092)o Unadjusted Kaplan Meier curve also showed a lower cumulative incidence of rejection in TTV positive at D0 patients.
Solis, ‘19 28/63 p AMR Before Tx T, >3.4 0.14 (0.04–0.43) q A similar result was found at M1, with a threshold of 4.2 log.
van Rijn, ‘21 88/389 AR Time‐varying C, 1 0.74 (0.71–0.76) No other analyses are performed for rejection.
Blatter, ‘20 21/51 ACR Before Tx, 1, 2, 3, and 5 wks (ratio) r M No association between TTV‐load (ratios) and ACR or graft dysfunction.
Frye, ‘19 13/13 s BPR D0‐M1 T, x1/10 t u A sensitivity and specificity of 0.74 and 0.99 is shown for detecting BPR s . Findings were similar for different outcome definitions.
Nordén, ‘17 nd/98 v AR Time‐varying (M3‐24) C u Analyses stratified on time (1–3, 3–6, 6–12 and 12–24 months post Tx) showed no association between the TTV‐load and the number of acute rejections.
Ruiz, ‘19 19/63 v BPR During rejection M TTV‐load was similar patients with versus without BPR, and lower during clinical versus subclinical/no rejection, and moderate versus mild rejection.

Abbreviatopns: ACR, Acute cellular rejection; ABMR, antibody mediated rejection; AR, Acute rejection; BPAR, Biopsy proven acute rejectionc; BPR, biopsy proven rejection; CLAD, chronic allograft dysfunction; HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio.

a

TTV exposure C: continuous, and step load increase in Log10. T: TTV load threshold, M: median or mean TTV load was compared in patients with and without outcome.

b

Number taken from figure.

c

Inverse of reported OR from supplement S2.

d

Adjusted for ATG as induction and previous SOT.

e

Total includes 27 controls.

f

Approximated from test accuracy numbers.

g

Median of 4.4 (ABMR+) and 6.6 (ABMR‐) yr after Tx.

h

Numbers from univariate analysis.

i

Median of 127 d (105–174) post‐Tx.

j

Number reported in supplement S6.

k

Numbers reported in text, however the numbers reported in the table differ slightly.

l

Which 3 month window is used to determine the TTV‐load is not reported.

m

Adjusted for age, gender, HBV, HCV, HIV serostatus, underlying disease, number of immunosuppressive drugs used, hepatic encephalopathy, and presence of DSA's.

n

A cohort composed of 50 BKV viruric patients +16 non BKV‐viremic patients, of which 63 had detectable TTV‐load, and 28 were BKV viremic.

o

Inverse of reported HR.

p

TTV‐load ratios were used as exposure.

q

The test accuracy is calculated on a biopsy proven rejection group.

r

Author definition of threshold: 10‐fold decrease of the individual TTV‐DNA levels within 1 month independently of the relative TTV‐DNA level.

s

No OR reported or numbers from which the OR can be approximated.

t

The number of patients with outcome is reported only per periodic interval.

u

ORs not reported.

v

19 patients with 20 episodes of rejection.