Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 18;28(4):e175–e182. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac267

Table 2.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Author/ country Study design Sample size Name of program/app Intervention group Control group
Egbring 201624 Switzerland 3-arm RCT N = 139 Consilium Care Group B: Used the Consilium Care app without a physician review
Group C: Used the mobile app and reviewed the reported data with the physician at scheduled visits
Group A: Received regular physician support
No access to a mobile app while undergoing chemotherapy
Fjell 202025 Sweden RCT N = 149 Interaktor Symptom self-reporting
Sent reminders to submit a report Monitored patient reports in real time Sent alerts of risk symptoms
Provided self-care advice and relevant websites
Had visits with a physician before each chemotherapy session
Had visits with a contact nurse
Consulted with the nurse by telephone
Handa 202026 Japan Feasibility RCT N = 95 Breast cancer patient support system (BPSS) Evaluated the side effects and recorded symptoms reported by patients. Provide tips on self-care Received ordinary instructions on symptom management
Received explanatory materials compiled by the anticancer agent manufacturers
Recorded progress using their own notes
Post et al. (2013)27 USA Pilot RCT N = 50 Communicating Health Assisted by Technology (CHAT) Completed symptom inventories Viewed videos on how to communicate about symptoms Tracked and shared symptom records with clinicians Received the usual care
Zhu et al. (2018)28 China RCT N = 104 Breast cancer e-support (BCS) program Learning forum Discussion forum
Ask-the-Expert forum Personal Stories forum
Had no access to breast cancer e-support (BCS)
No restrictions imposed on both groups in terms of performing other internet searches for information or social support