Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 1;30(2):425–434. doi: 10.1007/s10880-022-09896-3

Table 2.

Intent-to-treat model estimates for primary and secondary outcome measures

Estimated mean (SD)
MAPs (n = 27) Wait-list control (n = 39) Value (95% CI)
Outcome, scale range Baseline Post-intervention Baseline Post-intervention Difference in post-intervention values Effect sizec
Primary outcome
Perceived stress scale, 0–70a 25.9 (7.3) 22.4 (7.4)d 25.8 (6.0) 24.1 (6.1) 2.20 (0.47–3.93) 0.91 (0.19–1.62)
Secondary outcomes
Maslach burnout inventory, 0–18
 Emotional exhaustiona 10.7 (4.8) 9.7 (4.9) 10.6 (4.0) 10.2 (4.1) 0.48 (− 0.66–1.62) 0.30 (− 0.41–1.01)
Depersonalizationa 6.0 (4.8) 5.6 (4.7) 5.9 (4.0) 6.0 (4.1) 0.37 (− 0.77–1.51) 0.23 (− 0.48–0.94)
 Personal accomplishmentb 13.8 (3.9) 14.1 (3.9) 13.9 (3.1) 13.9 (3.3) − 0.25 (− 1.17–0.67) − 0.20 (− 0.92–0.52)
Beck depression inventory, 0–63a 6.8 (6.0) 7.2 (6.2) 6.8 (5.0) 6.4 (5.2) − 0.80 (− 2.23–0.63) − 0.40 (− 1.10–0.31)
Beck anxiety inventory, 0–63a 6.8 (7.4) 4.2 (7.5)d 6.1 (6.1) 4.3 (6.5)d 0.08 (− 1.70–1.86) 0.03 (− 0.69–0.75)
UCLA loneliness scale, 20–80a 37.6 (10.3) 37.2 (10.5) 37.4 (8.5) 37.9 (8.8) 0.65 (− 1.78–3.09) 0.19 (− 0.52–0.90)
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, 0–21a 5.0 (3.2) 4.9 (3.2) 5.2 (2.7) 4.7 (2.8) − 0.14 (− 0.90–0.63) − 0.13 (− 0.84–0.59)

aLower scores indicate improvement

bHigher scores indicated improvement

cBias-corrected Hedges g covarying for baseline values

dSignificant change from baseline to post-intervention at p < 0.05