Table 3. Studies focusing on dietary diversity score (DDS).
Author (y) | Objective (s) | Study design | Settings | Sample | Age | Sex | Exposure | Outcomes | Main finding including description for each article |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Herrador Z, 2015 [81] | To identify associated factors for low dietary diversity and lack of consumption of animal source food (ASF) | A cross-sectional survey with an additional follow up observation study | Urban/rural | 886 (320 aged 10–18) | 10–18 | M/F | - | DDS | Low DDS; rural 85.3%, urban 58.5%. Consumption of animal source food 17.5%. |
Mulugeta A, 2015 [83] | To examine means of reaching adolescent girls for iron supplementation | Cross-sectional study | Urban/rural | 828 | 15–19 | F | - | DDS | Prevalence of low, medium and high DDS was 54%, 42.9% and 3.1%, respectively. Mean DDS: 3.5 Schools (45%), health centers (27%) and health posts (26%) were the preferred public facilities for provision of iron supplements to school adolescents. Schools (11%), health centers (47%) and health posts (41%) were the preferred public facilities for provision of iron supplements to out of school adolescent |
Tamiru D, 2016 [28] | To assess the effectiveness of school-based health and nutrition Intervention, supported with backyard gardening, on dietary diversity | Quasi experimental study | Urban/rural | 1000 | 10–19 | M/F | School-based health and nutrition intervention supported with backyard gardening | DDS | Prevalence of adequate DDS in the intervention group across time was 34.8% at baseline, 65.6% at midline and 74.7% at end line. Prevalence of adequate DDS in the control group across time was (32.1%) at baseline, (49.4%) at midline and (48.8%) end line. Effect of the intervention between intervention and control group: there was statistically significant difference at mid-point (F = 5.64, p = 0.042) and end (F = 5.85, p b 0.001). |
Melaku Y 2017 [85] | To assess optimal dietary practices and nutritional knowledge | Cross sectional study | Urban/rural | 455 | 14–19 | F | Age, residency, maternal education, father occupation, family size | DDS | Mean (±SD) DDS was 4.3 ± 1.4. Low (<5) DDS 61.3% (Urban 37.7%, rural 50.0%) Low DDS predictors: attending government school (AOR = 5.2; 95% CI: 2.9,9.4), mothers illiterate (AOR = 7.7; 95%CI:3.4, 17.2), PRIMARY level education (AOR = 5.4; 95%CI: 2.6, 11.3), lower family economic status (AOR = 1.9; 95%CI: 1.0, 3.4) |
Gali N, 2017 [44] | To assess emerging nutritional problems and their association with dietary intake among school adolescents | Cross-sectional study | Urban | 546 | Mean age 15.4 (SD 1.9) | M/F | - | DDS | Mean DDS was 6.97±1.15. Cereal based diets (99.6%) and vegetables (73.9%) were the two most common foods types consumed by adolescents. |
Birru SM, 2018 [84] | To assess the dietary diversity of school adolescent girls in the context of urban Northwest Ethiopia | Cross-sectional study | Urban | 768 | 10–19 | F | School type, family occupation | DDS | Adequate DDS 75.4% (95%CI (72.3, 78.6). Adequate DDS associated with attending private school (AOR = 3.2; 95%CI: 1.9,5.3), being from merchant family (AOR = 2.4; 95%CI: 1.1,5.5) |
Seyoum Y, 2019 [72] | To assess the prevalence of adequate dietary diversity among adolescents | Cross-sectional study | Rural | 257 | 15–19 | F | - | DDS | Only 4.3% of the adolescent girls had adequate dietary diversity (WDDS ≥5) |
Tariku A, 2019 [82] | To assess the prevalence and associated factors of dietary diversity in adolescent girls | Cross-sectional study | Urban/rural | 1550 | 10–19 | F | food insecurity | DDS | Adequate dietary diversity was 14.5 (95% CI 12.9, 16.2), Households food security 74.9% Food secure adolescent are more likely to have adequate DDS (AOR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.03, 2.1) |
Regasa RT 2019 [80] | To determine the dietary diversity of adolescents | Cross sectional study | Urban/rural | 448 | 10–19 | F | - | DDS | Mean DDS 3.3 + 1.2 Low DDS 56%, moderate DDS 41% and high DDS 3% |