Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 23;14:1160625. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1160625

Table 2.

The associations between family PIR and hepatic steatosis.

Exposure Model 1 [β (95% CI)] Model 2 [β (95% CI)] Model 3 [β (95% CI)]
Ratio of family income to poverty -3.51 (-5.17, -1.84) -3.65 (-5.37, -1.93) -4.78 (-7.39, -2.17)
PIR classification
Low income (PIR < 1) ref ref ref
Middle income (PIR 1-4) -3.69 (-9.87, 2.49) -4.40 (-10.63, 1.83) -7.73 (-17.18, 1.73)
High income (PIR ≥ 4) -16.44 (-24.23, -8.64) -16.89 (-24.85, -8.93) -21.85 (-33.94, -9.76)

Model 1: no covariates were adjusted. Model 2: age, gender, and race were adjusted. Model 3: age, gender, race, BMI, physical activities, diabetes status, Triglycerides, HDL-C and LDL-C were adjusted.

PIR, Ratio of family income to poverty; BMI, body mass index; HDL-C, High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CAP, Controlled Attenuation Parameter.