Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 4;7(4):e0110. doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000110

TABLE 3.

Pathway enrichment

Enrichr
PBMC subset Module Comparison group direction of effect in WGCNA Hallmark pathway p q
CD14+ Salmon TNFα signalling through NF-кB 1.75×10−52 7.89×10−51
Apoptosis 3.45×10−6 3.58×10−5
Inline graphic Inline graphic NR vs. CN mTORC1 signalling 4.78×10−6 3.58×10−5
KRAS signalling up 4.78×10−6 3.58×10−5
IL-2/STAT5 signalling 2.56×10−6 1.51×10−4
IFNγ response 2.69×10−6 1.51×10−4
TH1 Yellow Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic NR vs. CN TNFα signalling via NF-кB 2.35×10−39 1.08×10−37
Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic R vs. CN p53 pathway 2.36×10−4 3.63×10−3
Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic CS vs. CN Apoptosis 5.30×10−4 6.10×10−3
Green
IL-2/STAT5 signalling 2.32×10−4 2.77×10−3
Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic R vs. CN IFNγ response 2.46×10−4 2.77×10−3
Inline graphic Inline graphic NR vs. CN IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signalling 1.83×10−3 9.94×10−3
Inline graphic Inline graphic CS vs. CN TNFα signalling through NF-кB 1.99×10−3 9.94×10−3
KRAS signalling up 1.99×10−3 9.94×10−3
TH17 Purple Inline graphic Inline graphic NR vs. CN TNFα signalling through NF-кB 3.35×10−6 8.71×10−5
Inline graphic Inline graphic R vs. CN
Inline graphic Inline graphic CS vs. CN
Red Inline graphic Inline graphic NR vs. CN TNFα signalling via NF-кB 2.04×10−30 9.40×10−29
Inline graphic Inline graphic CS vs. CN IFNγ response 3.72×10−6 4.27×10−5
Inline graphic Inline graphic R vs. CN IL-2/STAT5 signalling 1.52×10−5 1.40×10−4
Magenta Inline graphic Inline graphic R vs. CN KRAS signalling up 1.13×10−9 2.08×10−8
IFNγ response 6.48×10−5 4.79×10−4
IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signalling 1.40×10−4 8.60×10−4
TREG Green Inline graphic Inline graphic R vs. CN TNFα signalling through NF-кB 1.74×10−2 6.43×10−1
Brown Inline graphic Inline graphic R vs. NR KRAS signalling up 1.44×10−6 6.77×10−5
Inline graphic Inline graphic NR vs. CN IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signalling 8.10×10−6 1.27×10−4
Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic R vs. CN IL-2/STAT5 signalling 1.33×10−5 1.36×10−4
Inline graphic Inline graphic CS vs. CN TNFα signalling through NF-кB 4.27×10−5 2.87×10−4
B Black Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic R vs. CN TNFα signalling through NF-кB 2.60×10−4 1.09×10−2
Inline graphic Inline graphic CS vs. CN

Notes: Enrichment of Hallmark pathways was evaluated using the platform, Enrichr.

Pathways enriched at q<0.05 are shown.

The direction of effect for the comparison groups is highlighted.

Inline graphicindicates positive correlation,Inline graphicindicates negative correlation.

q is the FDR corrected p-value.

▴▴indicates moderate correlation ▴▴▴indicates strong correlation.

Abbreviation: FDR, false discovery rate; NR, non-responder.