Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 6;190(5):178. doi: 10.1007/s00604-023-05763-6

Table 1.

Method validation data for mycotoxin determination in natural grass samples

Analyte Linear range (μg kg−1) Linearity, R2 LOD (μg kg−1) LOQ (μg kg−1)
DON 92–750 0.990 27 92
AFG2 1.7–100 0.989 0.51 1.7
AFG1 0.95–100 0.998 0.28 0.95
AFB2 1.3–100 0.996 0.38 1.3
AFB1 0.61–100 0.998 0.18 0.61
HT-2 37–750 0.994 11 37
T-2 17–750 0.995 5.3 17
OTA 1.9–100 0.985 0.57 1.9
ENNB 0.07–100 0.993 0.02 0.07
BEA 0.09–100 0.994 0.03 0.09
ENNB1 0.09–100 0.997 0.03 0.09
ENNA1 0.07–100 0.987 0.02 0.07
ENNA 0.08–100 0.996 0.02 0.08
Trueness, % RSD (n = 9) SSE (%)
Low level High level
DON 90 (4.2) 98 (5.9) 42.0
AFG2 96 (2.1) 97 (5.3) 52.4
AFG1 110 (5.9) 100 (2.8) 57.7
AFB2 90 (4.4) 105 (5.8) 56.4
AFB1 108 (6.5) 110 (2.1) 59.9
HT-2 82 (7.1) 106 (1.9) 66.3
T-2 76 (2.8) 92 (8.7) 47.1
OTA 78 (2.7) 103 (8.1) 42.4
ENNB 107 (4.5) 106 (1.8) 91.9
BEA 95 (5.3) 97 (1.9) 89.6
ENNB1 102 (4.7) 104 (6.1) 92.2
ENNA1 99 (3.1) 104 (2.6) 89.5
ENNA 104 (5.0) 108 (3.2) 88.0
Repeatability, % RSD (n = 6) Intermediate precision, % RSD (n = 18)
Low level High level Low level High level
DON 5.4 3.7 7.3 6
AFG2 1.5 2.6 5.4 6
AFG1 3.8 4.1 8.1 5.9
AFB2 4.8 8.5 7.3 9.5
AFB1 5.6 5.5 7.8 8.8
HT-2 2.9 6.8 8.7 10.2
T-2 3.2 5.1 4.2 10.2
OTA 4.7 6.1 6.4 7.1
ENNB 2.8 5.8 3.6 7.3
BEA 4.9 5.4 7.1 7.8
ENNB1 2.4 3.6 4.5 5.6
ENNA1 2.6 4.8 4.9 8.4
ENNA 3.5 3.6 6.8 6.9

LOD, limit of detection (S/N = 3); LOQ, limit of quantification (S/N = 10); SSE, magnitude of signal suppression/enhancement

Low level: 5 μg kg−1 for AFs, OTA, BEA, and ENNs; 300 μg kg−1 for DON, HT-2, and T-2

High level: 25 μg kg−1 for AFs, OTA, BEA, and ENNs; 500 μg kg−1 for DON, HT-2, and T-2