TABLE 2.
Selection of hydrogel-based bioelectronic devices, classified according to the fabrication technique. Devices are qualitatively scored based on a level of maturity (LM) scale: 1- Proof of concept (mechanical, electrical and electrochemical testing); 2- In vitro testing (e.g., cytotoxicity); 3- In vivo acute testing on small animals (rodents); 4- In vivo acute testing on large animals (pigs, monkeys, cats, dogs); 5- In vivo chronic testing on rodents; 6- In vivo chronic testing on large animals; 7- Clinical trials.
| Fabrication process | Hydrogel material | Function of the hydrogel in the device | Application | LM | Key metrics | Resolution | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Photo-lithography | PEDOT: PSS hydrogel | Conductive hydrogel encapsulated in elastomer PFPE-DMA | Stimulation of the sciatic nerve | 5 | • σ = 47.4 ± 1.2 S/cm | 2 µm | Liu et al. (2019) |
| • tH = 200 nm | |||||||
| • E = 32 ± 5.1 kPa (compression) | |||||||
| • Z > 100 MΩ | |||||||
| PEG | Coating of the electrode, hydrogel loaded with anti-inflammatory drugs and PEDOT:PSS | Stimulation of the sciatic nerve | 1 | • Z = 580.2 ± 40.1 Ω (1 kHz) | 200 µm | Heo et al. (2016) | |
| • tH = 208 ± 11 μm | |||||||
| • CDC = 2.67 ± 0.37 μC/mm2 | |||||||
| Soft lithography | HA–Collagen I–laminin | Encapsulation of polyimide microelectrodes | TE electronic nerve interface | 1 | • Diameter = 1mm | 1 mm | Spearman et al. (2020) |
| • EH = 2.55 ± 0.05 kPa | |||||||
| PU | PU encapsulation and PEDOT/PU–hydrogel hybrid (working electrode) | Advanced tissue engineering including electronics | 2 | • σ = 120 S/cm | 40 µm | Sasaki et al. (2014) | |
| • tH = 200µm | |||||||
| • Elongation ratio = 100% | |||||||
| Direct ink writing and Inkjet printing | PEDOT:PSS hydrogel | PEDOT: PSS electrical circuit encapsulated in PDMS | Neural probe | 5 | • E = 1.1 MPa | 30 μm | Yuk et al. (2020) |
| • σ = 28 S/cm | |||||||
| • Z = 50–150 Ω (1 kHz) | |||||||
| PANI hydrogel | Conductor track | N.A. | 1 | • Capacitance = 480 F/g | 18 μm | Pan et al. (2012) | |
| • R = 3.2 Ω | |||||||
| • σ = 0.23 S/cm | |||||||
| Transfer printing | Fe3+ -[PEG-Dopa]4 | Encapsulation | Microelectrode array for recording the sciatic nerve | 6 | • E = 17.9 ± 0.3 kPa | 25 μm | Huang et al. (2018) |
| • tH = 1 mm | |||||||
| • Z = 32.2 ± 8.3 kΩ (f = 1 kHz) | |||||||
| Gelatin and GelMa | All hydrogel-based device GelMa doped with Ag NWs, Pt NWs, and PEDOT:PSS | Microelectrode array for neural interface | 2 | • ZGelMa = 38.3–52.4 Ω (f = 1 kHz) | 30 µm | Lin et al. (2021) | |
| • E = 180 kPa | |||||||
| • Rs = 592 ± 22.7 Ω | |||||||
| Laser patterning | PEDOT: PSS | PEDOT: PSS hydrogel encapsulated in PDMS | Stimulation and recording of the sciatic neve | 5 | • E = 57 MPa | 6 µm | Won et al. (2022) |
| • σ = 670 S/cm | |||||||
| • Z = 6 kΩ (f = 1 kHz) |