Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 24;10:1125875. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1125875

Table 2.

Evaluation of the performance of the four models.

AUC(95%CI) Accuracy(95%CI) Sensitivity(95%CI) Specificity(95%CI) F1 Score(95%CI)
KNN Training set 0.973 (0.954–0.992) 0.954 (0.950-0.958) 0.946 (0.922-0.969) 0.910 (0.889-0.931) 0.883 (0.865-0.900)
Validation set 0.945 (0.888–0.999) 0.949 (0.938–0.959) 0.879 (0.833–0.925) 0.931 (0.900–0.963) 0.838 (0.795–0.881)
XGBoost Training set 0.987 (0.978–0.995) 0.934 (0.928–0.939) 0.957 (0.948–0.965) 0.927 (0.920–0.933) 0.799 (0.786–0.813)
Validation set 0.963 (0.922–1.000) 0.916 (0.902–0.929) 0.926 (0.888–0.964) 0.923 (0.903–0.943) 0.743 (0.699–0.787)
RandomForest Training set 0.968 (0.951–0.985) 0.897 (0.885–0.909) 0.925 (0.902–0.948) 0.890 (0.872–0.908) 0.714 (0.692–0.735)
Validation set 0.961 (0.918–0.999) 0.889 (0.868–0.910) 0.890 (0.852–0.927) 0.961 (0.945–0.976) 0.678 (0.622–0.735)
SVM Training set 0.967 (0.946–0.989) 0.911 (0.905–0.916) 0.923 (0.910–0.935) 0.906 (0.898–0.914) 0.740 (0.731–0.749)
Validation set 0.962 (0.917–1.000) 0.897 (0.880–0.914) 0.909 (0.869–0.950) 0.951 (0.932–0.970) 0.697(0.644–0.750)

CI, confidence interval.