Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 26;17(2):86–96. doi: 10.1177/18632521221144060

Table 4.

Comparison of MRI parameters between the hips with and without residual dysplasia.

Groups Residual dysplasia
(n = 13 hips)
No residual dysplasia
(n = 15 hips)
p
Post-reduction MRI Mean ±SD (95% CI) Mean ±SD (95% CI)
Acetabular version (°) 25 ±6 (22 to 29) 20 ±5 (17 to 22) 0.03
Femoroacetabular distance axial (mm) 6 ±1 (5 to 7) 4 ±2 (3 to 5) 0.01
Femoroacetabular distance coronal (mm) 7 ±1 (6 to 7) 5 ±1 (4 to 5) 0.006
Acetabular depth–width ratio (%) 19 ±6 (15 to 23) 20 ±4 (18 to 22) 0.38
Osseous acetabular index (°) 39 ±7 (35 to 43) 31 ±7 (27 to 35) 0.02
Cartilaginous acetabular index (°) 17 ±6 (13 to 21) 14 ±5 (11 to 17) 0.17
Limbus thickness (mm) 6 ±1 (5 to 7) 4 ±1 (3 to 4) 0.02
Medial cartilage thickness (mm) 3 ±1 (2 to 3) 2 ±1 (1 to 2) 0.01
Last radiographic follow-up Mean ±SD Mean ±SD (95% CI) p
Duration of follow-up (years) 14 ±3 (12 to 16) 13 ±3 (11 to 14) 0.16
Lateral center edge angle (°) 23 ±11 (17 to 29) 30 ±6 (26 to 33) 0.06
Acetabular index (°) 13 ±10 (7 to 19) 10 ±6 (6 to 13) 0.26
Breach in Shenton’s line (hips, %) 3 23% (0% to 46%) 1 7% (–6% to 20%) 0.24
Severin grade > 2 (hips, %) 7 54% (27% to 81%) 0 0% <0.001

MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval.