Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 31;12(3):433–443. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-50

Table 4. Comparison of 2 groups at different timepoints after treatment.

Category 3 months 6 months 12 months
Study group (N=75) Control group (N=71) Z P Study group (N=75) Control group (N=71) Z P Study group (N=75) Control group (N=71) Z P
Recurrence of bladder prolapse 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000
   Yes 0 0 0 3 0 3
   No 74 69 72 65 69 63
Dysuria 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000
   Yes 0 0 0 3 0 4
   No 74 69 72 65 69 62
Detrusor instability 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000
   Yes 0 0 0 7 2 14
   No 74 69 72 61 67 52
Overactivity 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000
   Yes 0 0 0 7 2 14
   No 74 69 72 61 67 52
Infection 0.000 1.000 −0.408 0.683 0.000 1.000
   Yes 0 2 1 1 1 3
   No 74 67 71 67 68 63
Stress UI after surgical procedure 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000
   Yes 0 0 0 3 0 3
   No 74 69 72 65 69 63
Urge UI after surgical procedure 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000
   Yes 0 0 0 7 2 14
   No 74 69 72 61 67 52
Mixed UI after surgical procedure 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000
   Yes 0 0 0 1 0 1
   No 74 69 72 67 69 65
Mesh rejection 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000
   Yes 0 1 0 1 0 2
   No 74 68 72 67 69 64
Mesh erosion 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000
   Yes 0 1 0 2 0 1
   No 74 68 72 66 69 65
Embolism or thrombosis −0.775 0.439 0.000 1.000
   Yes 1 0 0 0 1
   No 73 69 72 68 68

In the safety analysis, there were 14 missing cases in total, and some cases had been lost at the beginning of the study. Therefore, in the effectiveness analysis, the data of the missing persons were treated with missing values. Rank combination test was used to compare the classification data. UI, urinary incontinence.