Table 2. Quality evaluation of included studies.
Included studies | Quality Review score (NOS) | Selection of research subjects | Comparability between groups | Outcome measurement | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experimental group representativeness | Control group representativeness | Definition of experimental group | Definition of control group | Outcome measures | Follow-up time | Completeness of follow-up | |||
Kurku, 2019 | 9 | Good | Good | Clear | Clear | Good | Low risk | Long | Good |
Malecki, 2020 | 8 | Uncertain | Good | Clear | Clear | Good | Low risk | Long | Good |
Kwon, 2020 | 9 | Good | Good | Clear | Clear | Good | Low risk | Long | Good |
Thompson, 2017 | 6 | Uncertain | Uncertain | Clear | Clear | Uncertain | Low risk | Long | Good |
Battal, 2018 | 6 | Good | Good | Clear | Uncertain | Uncertain | Uncertain | Long | Uncertain |
Elkabany, 2020 | 8 | Uncertain | Good | Clear | Clear | Good | Low risk | Long | Good |
Gupta, 2020 | 7 | Good | Good | Clear | Clear | Good | Uncertain | Long | Uncertain |
Hattar, 2011 | 9 | Good | Good | Clear | Clear | Good | Low risk | Long | Good |
Hu W, 2017 | 8 | Good | Uncertain | Clear | Clear | Good | Low risk | Long | Good |
Liu F, 2022 | 8 | Good | Good | Clear | Clear | Good | Uncertain | Long | Good |
Antunes, 2013 | 4 | Uncertain | Uncertain | Uncertain | Clear | Uncertain | Low risk | Uncertain | Good |
Grønbæk H, 2012 (10 weeks) | 7 | Good | Good | Clear | Uncertain | Uncertain | Uncertain | Long | Good |
Grønbæk H, 2012 (12 months) | 8 | Good | Good | Clear | Clear | Good | Low risk | Long | Uncertain |
Koot BG, 2011 | 9 | Good | Good | Clear | Clear | Good | Low risk | Long | Good |
Verduci, 2013 | 8 | Good | Good | Clear | Clear | Uncertain | Low risk | Long | Good |
Nier, 2018 | 8 | Good | Good | Clear | Clear | Uncertain | Low risk | Long | Good |
NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale