Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 27;15(3):450–470. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i3.450

Table 5.

Summary of the performance for all preoperative models in predicting perioperative mortality

Ref.
Predictive model
Discrimination
Calibration
Outcome
Bosch et al[44], 2011 CCI (2) AUC = 0.567 HL P value (0.659) Mortality
Filip et al[46], 2014 AUC = 0.736 Not reported Mortality
Bosch et al[44], 2011 ACCI (2) AUC = 0.684 HL P value (0.270) Mortality
Filip et al[46], 2014 AUC = 0.744 Not reported Mortality
Steyerberg et al[30], 2006 Rotterdam score (3) AUC = 0.70 “Excellent” Mortality
Zingg et al[42], 2009 P value = 0.003 HL P value (0.266) Mortality
D’Journo et al[52], 2017 AUC = 0.64 Fair (overpredicts) Mortality
Ra et al[32], 2008 Philadelphia score (2) “Effective” “Good” Mortality
Zingg et al[42], 2009 P value = 0.001 HL P value (0.735) Mortality
Wright et al[33], 2009 Original STS model AUC = 0.621 Not reported Major morbidity or mortality
Peng et al[54], 2020 NSQIP SRC (2) AUC = 0.627 O:E = 1.13 Mortality
Ravindran et al[55], 2020 AUC = 0.880 Not reported Mortality
Takeuchi et al[35], 2014 Takeuchi model (2) AUC = 0.766 Not reported Mortality
Takeuchi et al[51], 2018 AUC = 0.697 Not reported Mortality
Raymond et al[37], 2016 Revised STS model AUC = 0.71 Not reported Mortality
Reeh et al[38], 2016 PER score P = 0.001 Not reported Mortality
Wan et al[41], 2022 RAI-A AUC = 0.58 Not reported Mortality
5 Factor MFI AUC = 0.58 Not reported Mortality
RAI-revised AUC = 0.62 Not reported Mortality
RAI-revised (CC) AUC = 0.60 Not reported Mortality

AUC: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; HL: Hosmer-Lemeshow; O:E: Observed:expected ratio; CCI: Charlson comorbidity index; ACCI: Age-adjusted charlson comorbidity index; NSQIP SRC: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator; RAI-A: Administrative risk analysis index; STS: Society of Thoracic Surgeons Oesophagectomy Composite Score; PNI: Prognostic nutritional index; PER: Perioperative esophagectomy risk score.