Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 27;15(3):450–470. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i3.450

Table 8.

Summary of the performance for all preoperative models in predicting respiratory complications, return to theatre, readmission and anastomotic leak

Ref.
Predictive model
Discrimination
Calibration
Outcome
Yamana et al[47], 2015 PNI AUC = 0.609 Not reported Respiratory complications
Yamana et al[47], 2015 GNRI AUC = 0.651 Not reported Respiratory complications
Ferguson et al[34], 2011 Ferguson score (3) AUC = 0.708 HL P value (0.16) Respiratory complications
Reinersman et al[49], 2016 AUC = 0.726 HL P value (0.2394) Respiratory complications
Xing et al[50], 2016 AUC = 0.539 Not reported Respiratory complications
Gray et al[53], 2020 NSQIP SRC (3) AUC = 0.533 Insufficient Return to theatre
AUC = 0.625 Insufficient Readmission
Peng et al[54], 2020 AUC = 0.558 O:E = 0.48 Return to theatre
AUC = 0.558 O:E = 1.11 Readmission
Ravindran et al[55], 2020 AUC = 0.584 Not reported Return to theatre
AUC = 0.767 Not reported Readmission
Ohkura et al[40], 2020 JNCD model AUC = 0.531 Not reported Anastomotic leak

AUC: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; HL: Hosmer-Lemeshow; O:E: Observed:expected ratio; PNI: Prognostic nutritional index; GNRI: Geriatric nutritional risk index; NSQIP SRC: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator; JNCD: Japanese National Clinical Database.