Table 3.
Summary of risk scores, surgical techniques performed and follow-up in patient populations
| Author | Risk score | MV Repair (%) | MV replacement (%) | Associated TV repair (%) | Associated AF surgery (%) | Follow-up (years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grossi et al. [10] | NI | 100 | 0 | NI | NI | NI |
| Nasso et al. [11] | NI | 100 | 0 | NI | NI | 3.2 ± 1.4 |
| Nishi et al. [12] | NI | 100 | 0 | NI | NI | NI |
| Downs et al. [13] | 1.75 ± 3.9a | 77.9 | 22.1 | NI | 27.3 | NI |
| Hawkins et al. [14] | NI | 73.3 | 26.7 | 9.4 | 37.8 | NI |
| Wang Q et al. [15] | 3.17 ± 1.2b | 100 | 0 | 70.1 | 23.9 | 2.8* |
| Grant et al. [16] | 5.4 ± 5.7c | 84.1 | 15.9 | 8.05 | 17.1 | 3.7* |
| Liu et al. [17] | 1.34 ± 0.67d | 0 | 100 | 93.8 | NI | 2.2 ± 1.1 |
| Paparella et al. [18] | 2.6 ± 2.96d | 65.2 | 34.8 | 13.7 | NI | NI |
| Cetinkaya et al. [19] | 7.6 ± 10.3c | 86.75 | 13.25 | 16.65 | 26.4 | 3 |
| Pojar et al. [20] | 2.78 ± 2.4d | 83.8 | 16.2 | 49.3 | 46.7 | 3.6 ± 2.1 |
| Olsthoorn et al. [21] | 3b* | 78.6 | 21.4 | 10.7 | 14.1 | 3.2 ± 2 |
| Mihaljevic et al. [22] | NI | 100 | 0 | NI | NI | NI |
| Suri et al. [23] | NI | 100 | 0 | NI | NI | NI |
| Iyigun et al. [24] | NI | 32.2 | 64.8 | 12.9 | NI | NI |
| Hawkins et al. [25] | 0.6a* | 82.9 | 17.1 | NI | NI | NI |
| Wang A et al. [26] | 2 ± 2a | 94.4 | 5.6 | NI | NI | 1.8 ± 1.2 |
| Coyan et al. [27] | 0.8a* | 83.5 | 16.5 | NI | NI | NI |
MV Mitral valve, TV Tricuspid valve, AF Atrial fibrillation, NI Not indicated
*Median
aSTS PROM score
bEuroscore
clogistic Euroscore
dEuroscore 2