Table 2.
Questionnaire results.
| Questionnaire survey result | (N = 36) |
|---|---|
| Cost of face-to-face regular programming (yuan) | |
| <500 | 17 (47.2) |
| 500–2,000 | 13 (36.1) |
| 2,000–5,000 | 1 (2.8) |
| 5,000–10,000 | 5 (13.9) |
| Time-consumption of face-to-face regular programming (hours) | |
| <12 | 10 (27.8) |
| 12–24 | 12 (33.3) |
| 24–48 | 10 (27.8) |
| ≥48 | 4 (11.1) |
| Reasons for applying for remote programming (multiple choices) | |
| Recurrent symptoms | 13 (36.1) |
| For further improvement | 21 (58.3) |
| Discomfort in the current stimulus parameters | 0 |
| Regular follow-up | 12 (33.3) |
| Expected frequency of remote programming | |
| Once a week | 1 (2.8) |
| Once every 1–3 months | 5 (13.9) |
| Once every 3–6 months | 4 (11.1) |
| Once a year | 1 (2.8) |
| When needed | 25 (69.4) |
| Reasons for choosing remote programming (multiple choices) | |
| Professional, can achieve expert-level service | 17 (47.2) |
| Timely programming adjustment can be obtained | 13 (36.1) |
| Save time and economic cost | 32 (88.9) |
| Improve the curative effect | 11 (30.6) |
| Affected by COVID-19, travel should be reduced as much as possible | 36 (100) |
| Question: Can you understand the operation process and use the remote programming platform? | |
| Yes. | 29 (80.6) |
| Still unable to understand and use under the guidance of others | 7 (19.4) |
| Satisfaction | |
| Very satisfied | 20 (55.6) |
| Satisfied | 13 (36.1) |
| Basically satisfied | 3 (8.3) |
| Not satisfied | 0 |
| Recommended level | |
| Excellent | 15 (41.7) |
| Good | 16 (44.4) |
| Fair | 5 (13.9) |
| Poor | 0 |
Values are expressed as n (%).