Table 5.
Estimates of Age-by-Period Interaction Terms in Models 1a and 2a.
White Women: Model 1a | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Period | |||||||
1990–94 | 1995–99 | 2000–04 | 2005–09 | 2010–14 | 2015–17 | ||
|
|||||||
Age | 20–24 | 0.152 *** | 0.097 *** | 0.040 ** | −0.050 *** | −0.129 *** | −0.109 *** |
25–29 | 0.070 *** | 0.061 *** | −0.026 | −0.060 *** | −0.082 *** | 0.038 * | |
30–34 | 0.065 *** | 0.029 | −0.009 | −0.044 ** | −0.023 | −0.018 | |
35–39 | 0.130 *** | 0.071 *** | −0.024 | −0.085 *** | −0.033 * | −0.059 *** | |
40–44 | 0.167 *** | 0.085 *** | 0.031 * | −0.032 * | −0.101 *** | −0 149 *** | |
45–49 | 0.032 * | 0.074 *** | 0.074 *** | 0.005 | −0.085 *** | −0.099 *** | |
50–54 | −0.118 *** | −0.014 | 0.069 *** | 0.061 *** | 0.041 ** | −0.040 * | |
55–59 | −0.224 *** | −0.151 *** | −0.057 *** | 0.111 *** | 0.158 *** | 0.164 *** | |
60–64 | −0.274 *** | −0.251 *** | −0.097 *** | 0.095 *** | 0.254 *** | 0.272 *** | |
| |||||||
Black Women: Model 2a | |||||||
Period | |||||||
1990–94 | 1995–99 | 2000–04 | 2005–09 | 2010–14 | 2015–17 | ||
|
|||||||
Age | 20–24 | 0.000 | 0.109 ** | −0.012 | −0.107 ** | 0.019 | −0.009 |
25–29 | −0.108 ** | 0.123 ** | 0.039 | 0.015 | −0.085 * | 0.015 | |
30–34 | −0.004 | 0.014 | 0.081 * | 0.059 | −0.134 *** | −0.016 | |
35–39 | 0.051 | 0.018 | 0.062 | −0.038 | −0.042 | −0.051 | |
40–44 | 0.161 *** | −0.062 | −0.020 | −0.042 | −0.018 | −0.019 | |
45–49 | 0.033 | −0.054 | −0.031 | 0.036 | −0.017 | 0.034 | |
50–54 | 0.019 | 0.045 | 0.022 | −0.098 ** | 0.011 | 0.001 | |
55–59 | −0.146 ** | −0.030 | −0.023 | 0.084 * | 0.096 ** | 0.019 | |
60–64 | −0.005 | −0.163 ** | −0.118 ** | 0.092 * | 0.171 *** | 0.024 |
Note: Table figures represent estimated age-by-period interaction terms coded to sum to zero in weighted logistic APC-I Models 1a for whites and Model 2a for blacks. Models 1a and 2a modeled white and black women’s labor force partication using age, period, and their interactions without covariates.
=p<0.001 ;
= p < 0.01 ;
= p < 0.05.