Table 2.

Morphometry analysis of soft and stiff fibrous cap models with different μBeads diameter at the same concentration of 1% weight. Values are reported as mean± SD per sample.

Group		Samples	Davg [μm]	Size ratio	Volume ratio [%]	Beads/mm3	# Close Pairs (h/D<1)	(h/D)min	(h/D) avg	UTS Drop [%]
6	Soft	10	5.9± 2	$\frac{1}{110}$	0.25± 0.16	5212± 2996	2± 2	0.61	0.81± 0.14	0.5
	Stiff	11	6.3± 3.6	$\frac{1}{110}$	0.22± 0.12	4061± 1039	3± 3	0.53	0.80± 0.13	1.9
20	Soft	10	18± 0.9	$\frac{1}{30}$	0.29± 0.05	254± 33	1± 1	0.58	0.80± 0.16	3.5
	Stiff	11	20± 0.9	$\frac{1}{30}$	0.33± 0.07	312± 50	2± 1	0.30	0.76± 0.19	8.9
40	Soft	11	43± 13	$\frac{1}{15}$	0.29± 0.04	54± 6	0.1± 0.3	0.95	0.95± 0.0	4.1
	Stiff	10	40± 13	$\frac{1}{15}$	0.34± 0.09	53± 7	0.2± 0.5	0.79	0.86± 0.09	10.9
80	Soft	12	86± 21	$\frac{1}{8}$	0.34± 0.07	9± 2	0.1± 0.3	0.90	0.90± 0.0	13.6
	Stiff	11	81± 27	$\frac{1}{8}$	0.39± 0.07	13± 2	0.3± 0.5	0.92	0.94± 0.03	23.7
250	Soft	11	245± 17	$\frac{1}{3}$	0.39± 0.26	0.5± 0.2	0.09± 0.3	/	/	30.3
	Stiff	10	254± 12	$\frac{1}{3}$	0.36± 0.18	0.4± 0.2	0± 0	/	/	32.7