Table 2.
Metabolite | Model | Balanced accuracy |
---|---|---|
L-Glutamate | M1 | 0.265 |
M1Smart | 0.478 | |
L-Proline | M1 | 0.300 |
M1Smart | 0.325 | |
L-Histidine | M1 | 0.289 |
M1Smart | 0.316 | |
L-Tryptophan | M1 | 0.250 |
M1Smart | 0.413 | |
L-Leucinea | M1 | 0.000 |
M1Smart | 0.000 | |
Adenineb | M1 | 0.000 |
M1Smart | 0.469 | |
Guanine | M1 | 0.406 |
M1Smart | 0.544 | |
Uracila | M1 | 0.000 |
M1Smart | 0.000 | |
Adenosine | M1 | 0.644 |
M1Smart | 0.544 | |
PEP | M1 | 0.507 |
M1Smart | 0.382 |
Balanced accuracy of the different models when predicting for significant changes in metabolite flux (p-value < 0.1, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) in comparison to observed significant changes in metabolite accumulation (p-value < 0.1, linear model) for all the comparisons available in the study.
ano correct matches done by either of the models.
bno significant observations for all pairwise comparisons.).