TABLE 1.
λm
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 10 | 50 | 100 | 200 | ||
| |||||||
λh | 200 | 0.87 (0.14) | 0.98 (0.02) | 0.88 (0.21) | 0.89 (0.18) | 0.87 (0.21) | 0.97 (0.02) |
100 | 0.85 (0.20) | 0.96 (0.04) | 0.86 (0.20) | 0.90 (0.10) | 0.84 (0.21) | 0.97 (0.03) | |
50 | 0.83 (0.20) | 0.88 (0.09) | 0.89 (0.22) | 0.84 (0.22) | 0.97 (0.01) | 0.98 (0.02) | |
10 | 0.87 (0.21) | 0.92 (0.09) | 0.84 (0.17) | 0.85 (0.21) | 0.99 (0.01) | 0.81 (0.23) | |
1 | 0.87 (0.18) | 0.84 (0.21) | 0.95 (0.07) | 0.89 (0.08) | 0.89 (0.12) | 0.76 (0.23) | |
0 | 0.93 (0.07) | 0.93 (0.07) | 0.93 (0.09) | 0.86 (0.15) | 0.94 (0.04) | 0.85 (0.21) |
Note: λh and λm are the relative task importance parameters in the overall loss function, representing high- and medium-resolution attentions, respectively. Three top performing combinations (λh = 200 and λm = 1; λh = 50 and λm = 200; λh = 10 and λm = 100) are in bold font.