Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 8;14(4):258. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-05776-2

Table 1.

Correlations between PRPF19 and clinicopathological features.

Variables Total cases (n = 125) (%) PRPF19 expression p Value
Low expression (n = 68) (%) High expression (n = 57) (%)
Gender
Male 68 (54.4) 36 (28.8) 32 (25.6) 0.857
Female 57 (45.6) 32 (25.6) 25 (20.0)
Age (years)
<60 48 (38.4) 26 (20.8) 22 (17.6) 0.556
≥60 77 (61.6) 42 (33.6) 35 (28.0)
Size (cm)
<5 58 (46.4) 40 (32.0) 18 (14.4) 0.004*
≥5 67 (53.6) 28 (22.4) 39 (31.2)
TNM stage
I-II 58 (46.4) 39 (31.2) 19 (15.2) 0.011*
III-IV 67 (53.6) 29 (23.2) 38 (30.4)
Depth of tumor invasion
T1-T2 25 (20.0) 19 (15.2) 6 (4.80) 0.024*
T3-T4 100 (80.0) 49 (39.2) 51 (40.8)
Lymph node metastasis
N0 58 (46.4) 39 (31.2) 19 (15.2) 0.022*
N1 27 (21.6) 13 (10.4) 14 (11.2)
N2 40 (32.0) 16 (12.8) 24 (19.2)
Liver metastasis
M0 87 (69.6) 54 (43.2) 33 (26.4) 0.011*
M1 38 (30.4) 14 (11.2) 24 (19.2)
CEA level (ng/ml)
<5 63 (50.4) 36 (28.8) 27 (21.6) 0.592
≥5 62 (49.6) 32 (25.6) 30 (24.0)

*p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.