Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 9.
Published in final edited form as: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Jan 10;12(9):1148–1183. doi: 10.1002/alr.22953

Table IV:

Summary of evidence on nasal saline

Study Year Study
Design
LOE Number of
Subjects
Study
Groups
Intervention Primary Endpoint Conclusion
Mainz29 2016 RCT 2 69 patients CF CRS Inhaled NaCl 0.9% versus Inhaled NaCl 6.0%
  1. SNOT-20

  2. Rhinomanometry

  3. Inflammatory markers in nasal lavage

Both treatment groups exhibited a significant improvement in SNOT-20, but one treatment was not significantly better than the other. There was a nonsignificant improvement in rhinometry.
Aanaes32 2018 Case series 4 12 patients CF CRS Nasal saline with radiotracer delivered after ESS
  1. Dynamic SPECT scan to measure sinonasal delivery of nasal saline following ESS

10/24 maxillary sinuses exhibited improvement compared with preoperative levels. No saline reached the frontal or sphenoid sinuses. Fluid reached the ethmoid sinuses and the maxillary sinuses were 23% filled, on average.
Jayawardena30 2020 Survey of providers 5 175 respondents who care for patients with CF CRS Otolaryngologists and pulmonologists Survey regarding the management of CF CRS
  1. Achieving consensus of ≥75% agreement amongst respondents

93% of respondents felt that maximal medical management of CF CRS should include nasal saline irrigations
Farzal31 2021 Survey of providers/patients 5 427 respondents including providers, patients, and caregivers Otolaryngologists, pulmonologists, CF patients, CF caregivers Survey regarding the management of CF CRS
  1. Nasal saline irrigation usage

67% of prescribers advocate isotonic nasal saline irrigations, while 29% recommend hypertonic saline irrigations.

CF: cystic fibrosis; CRS: chronic rhinosinusitis; RCT: randomized control trial; SNOT-20: 20 item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test