Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 15;12(2):e220134. doi: 10.1530/ETJ-22-0134

Table 3.

The percentage of the nodules examined (n = 123) in which the seven investigators deemed the given characteristic to be present (all values are given in %; mean, s.d., minimum, and maximum of the individual % values of the seven investigators).

Feature Answer Mean s.d. Minimum Maximum
Punctate echogenic foci
Present 53 19.1 39.4 93.5
Probably present 33.3 14.3 6.1 48.0
Probably absent 8.7 6.5 0.4 18.3
Absent 5.1 4.6 0 13.8
Microcalcification
Present 27.1 14.4 9.3 50.4
Absent 72.9 14.4 49.6 90.7
Extrathyroidal extension
Present 12.8 5.9 4.1 19.9
Absent 87.2 5.9 80.1 95.9
Margins
Smooth 45.2 16.9 22 63.4
Ill-defined 26.1 11.2 7.7 39.8
Irregular 20.8 8.9 11.4 34.1
Cannot be determined 7.8 9.1 0 18.3
Echogenicity
Iso-/hyperechogenic 24.2 12.9 8.1 41.1
Mildly/moderately hypoechogenic 43.7 12.8 28.5 60.2
Very hypoechogenic 21.5 11.6 7.7 37.4
Anechoic 2.7 1.5 0.8 5.3
Cannot be determined 7.8 11.1 0 28.0
Echogenicity (iso-/hyperechogenic and hypoechogenic nodules only)
Iso-/hyperechogenic 26.9 13.3 8.2 41.9
Hypoechogenic 73.1 13.3 58.1 91.8
Comet-tail artifact
Present 18.0 7.4 7.3 27.2
Absent 72.6 13.7 46.7 84.1
Uncertain 9.3 9.7 0 27.2
Back-wall cystic figure
Present 21.1 10.9 3.7 35.8
Absent 70.4 12.6 51.6 90.7
Uncertain 8.5 8.0 0 24.0
Macrocalcification
Present 17.8 7.0 11.4 27.2
Absent 79.6 6.5 70.7 87.8
Uncertain 2.7 2.1 0 6.5
Is the lesion a nodule?
Yes 96.5 4.0 87.8 99.6
No 3.5 4.0 0.4 12.2