Table 3.
The percentage of the nodules examined (n = 123) in which the seven investigators deemed the given characteristic to be present (all values are given in %; mean, s.d., minimum, and maximum of the individual % values of the seven investigators).
| Feature | Answer | Mean | s.d. | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Punctate echogenic foci | |||||
| Present | 53 | 19.1 | 39.4 | 93.5 | |
| Probably present | 33.3 | 14.3 | 6.1 | 48.0 | |
| Probably absent | 8.7 | 6.5 | 0.4 | 18.3 | |
| Absent | 5.1 | 4.6 | 0 | 13.8 | |
| Microcalcification | |||||
| Present | 27.1 | 14.4 | 9.3 | 50.4 | |
| Absent | 72.9 | 14.4 | 49.6 | 90.7 | |
| Extrathyroidal extension | |||||
| Present | 12.8 | 5.9 | 4.1 | 19.9 | |
| Absent | 87.2 | 5.9 | 80.1 | 95.9 | |
| Margins | |||||
| Smooth | 45.2 | 16.9 | 22 | 63.4 | |
| Ill-defined | 26.1 | 11.2 | 7.7 | 39.8 | |
| Irregular | 20.8 | 8.9 | 11.4 | 34.1 | |
| Cannot be determined | 7.8 | 9.1 | 0 | 18.3 | |
| Echogenicity | |||||
| Iso-/hyperechogenic | 24.2 | 12.9 | 8.1 | 41.1 | |
| Mildly/moderately hypoechogenic | 43.7 | 12.8 | 28.5 | 60.2 | |
| Very hypoechogenic | 21.5 | 11.6 | 7.7 | 37.4 | |
| Anechoic | 2.7 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 5.3 | |
| Cannot be determined | 7.8 | 11.1 | 0 | 28.0 | |
| Echogenicity (iso-/hyperechogenic and hypoechogenic nodules only) | |||||
| Iso-/hyperechogenic | 26.9 | 13.3 | 8.2 | 41.9 | |
| Hypoechogenic | 73.1 | 13.3 | 58.1 | 91.8 | |
| Comet-tail artifact | |||||
| Present | 18.0 | 7.4 | 7.3 | 27.2 | |
| Absent | 72.6 | 13.7 | 46.7 | 84.1 | |
| Uncertain | 9.3 | 9.7 | 0 | 27.2 | |
| Back-wall cystic figure | |||||
| Present | 21.1 | 10.9 | 3.7 | 35.8 | |
| Absent | 70.4 | 12.6 | 51.6 | 90.7 | |
| Uncertain | 8.5 | 8.0 | 0 | 24.0 | |
| Macrocalcification | |||||
| Present | 17.8 | 7.0 | 11.4 | 27.2 | |
| Absent | 79.6 | 6.5 | 70.7 | 87.8 | |
| Uncertain | 2.7 | 2.1 | 0 | 6.5 | |
| Is the lesion a nodule? | |||||
| Yes | 96.5 | 4.0 | 87.8 | 99.6 | |
| No | 3.5 | 4.0 | 0.4 | 12.2 | |
This work is licensed under a