Table 3. Performance of Each of Seven Team Creation Methods on Achieving Goals for Bonding.
| Method | Average Within-Team Standard Deviation | Average Between-Team Standard Deviation | Average Scores of the Least Bonded Team per Class | Average Scores of the Most Bonded Team per Class | Disparity | ES† |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SN_Cluster | 1.59 | 0.47 | 6.38 | 7.81 | 1.43 | 1.47 |
| SN_Prune | 1.61 | 0.41 | 6.45 | 7.70 | 1.25 | 1.82 |
| VI_Cluster | 1.59 | 0.48 | 6.37 | 7.87 | 1.50 | 1.34 |
| VI_Prune | 1.57 | 0.46 | 6.41 | 7.77 | 1.36 | 1.59 |
| ALL_Cluster | 1.59 | 0.48 | 6.38 | 7.88 | 1.50 | 1.34 |
| ALL_Prune | 1.59 | 0.49 | 6.41 | 7.86 | 1.45 | 1.42 |
| CF | 1.42 | 0.73 | 5.71 | 8.04 | 2.33 |
Bonding to School was constructed to form a 0–10 scale, with a score of 10 reflected greatest bonding and a score of 0 reflecting no bonding.
Disparity effect sizes for each experimental method compared to CF.