Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 10.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Sci. 2022 Jul 27;23(8):1359–1369. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01402-3

Table 3. Performance of Each of Seven Team Creation Methods on Achieving Goals for Bonding.

Method Average Within-Team Standard Deviation Average Between-Team Standard Deviation Average Scores of the Least Bonded Team per Class Average Scores of the Most Bonded Team per Class Disparity ES
SN_Cluster 1.59 0.47 6.38 7.81 1.43 1.47
SN_Prune 1.61 0.41 6.45 7.70 1.25 1.82
VI_Cluster 1.59 0.48 6.37 7.87 1.50 1.34
VI_Prune 1.57 0.46 6.41 7.77 1.36 1.59
ALL_Cluster 1.59 0.48 6.38 7.88 1.50 1.34
ALL_Prune 1.59 0.49 6.41 7.86 1.45 1.42
CF 1.42 0.73 5.71 8.04 2.33

Bonding to School was constructed to form a 0–10 scale, with a score of 10 reflected greatest bonding and a score of 0 reflecting no bonding.

Disparity effect sizes for each experimental method compared to CF.