Skip to main content
. 2022 May 16;133(2):327–335. doi: 10.1002/lary.30154

TABLE III.

The Performance Scores of the Multi‐Modal Deep Learning Model With Different Fusion Strategies and an Experienced Radiologist.

Training Input Vector Accuracy ROC‐AUC Sensitivity Specificity

T1

T2

CE‐T1

Early‐fusion 0.83 (0.73–0.92) 0.88 (0.74–0.98) 0.89 (0.67–1) 0.82 (0.70–0.93)
Late‐fusion Add. 0.87 (0.78–0.96) 0.88 (0.75–1) 0.69 (0.33–1) 0.91 (0.80–1)
Spl. 0.85 (0.76–0.94) 0.89 (0.72–0.99) 0.70 (0.44–1) 0.89 (0.78–0.98)

T2

CE‐T1

DWI‐b1000

Early‐fusion 0.76 (0.63–0.88) 0.86 (0.74–0.96) 0.70 (0.44–1) 0.77 (0.63–0.90)
Late‐fusion Add. 0.85 (0.73–0.94) 0.93 (0.83–0.99) 0.80 (0.56–1) 0.86 (0.75–0.95)
Spl. 0.85 (0.75–0.93) 0.96 (0.89–1) 0.90 (0.67–1) 0.84 (0.73–0.95)

DWI‐b0

DWI‐b1000

ADC

Early‐fusion 0.82 (0.69–92) 0.83 (0.65–0.96) 0.60 (0.22–0.89) 0.86 (0.75–0.98)
Late‐fusion Add. 0.83 (0.71–0.94) 0.87 (0.67–1) 0.79 (0.56–1) 0.84 (0.73–0.95)
Spl. 0.94 (0.88–0.1) 0.91 (0.7–1) 0.89 (0.67–1) 0.95 (0.88–1)
All MRI sequences (Early + late)‐fusion Add. 0.78 (0.65–0.88) 0.76 (0.56–0.91) 0.59 (0.33–0.89) 0.82 (0.70–0.93)
Spl. 0.76 (0.63–0.88) 0.84 (0.70–0.96) 0.69 (0.44–1) 0.77 (0.65–0.90)
Late‐fusion Add. 0.89 (0.80–0.96) 0.80 (0.56–1) 0.70 (0.33–1) 0.93 (0.85–1)
Spl. 0.81 (0.69–0.92) 0.95 (0.86–1) 0.81 (0.56–1) 0.81 (0.70–0.93)
Radiologist 0.70 (0.58–0.82) 0.74 (0.59–0.86) 0.70 (0.44–1) 0.70 (0.58–0.85)

Values in the parentheses indicate 95% confidence interval. Notable values are in bold, see main text for details. “Add.” = vector addition method, “Spl.” = vector splicing method.

ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient; DWI = diffusion‐weighted; MRI = magnetic resonance image; ROC = receiver operator characteristic.