Table 2.
An Intention to contact Cox‐regression analysis of the relationship between electronic compared to paper‐based SDQ‐P assignment and SDQ‐P completion rates (n = 195), adjusted model taking into account participant characteristics
| Crude H.R (95% CI) | p‐Value | Adjusted model H.R (95% CI) | p‐Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group (MHE vs. MAU) | 10.1 (4.3–23.6) | <.01 | 12.1 (4.7–30.9) | <.01 |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 0.4 (0.2–0.8) | .02 | ||
| Ethnicity | ||||
| White | Reference | – | ||
| Black | 0.5 (0.2–1.2) | .13 | ||
| Asian a | na | na | ||
| Mixed | 1.1 (0.4–2.5) | .88 | ||
| Other or not stated | 0.5 (0.2–1.4) | .16 | ||
| Age at trial start | 1.0 (0.9–1.1) | .90 | ||
| Co‐morbid diagnosis | ||||
| ADHD | 0.8 (0.4–1.6) | .47 | ||
| LD | 1.5 (0.6–4.0) | .44 | ||
| Emotional disorder | 2.5 (1.0–5.8) | .04 | ||
| Days of active care | 1.0 (1.0–1.0) | .77 | ||
| Attended F2F events | 1.0 (1.0–1.0) | .61 | ||
| Baseline SDQ scores | ||||
| Emotional | 1.0 (0.9–1.2) | .61 | ||
| Conduct | 1.0 (0.9–1.1) | .85 | ||
| Hyperactivity | 1.1 (1.0–1.3) | .17 | ||
| Peer difficulties | 1.0 (0.9–1.2) | .94 | ||
| Prosocial | 1.1 (0.9–1.2) | .94 | ||
a
Covariate dropped due to <5 cell size value.