TABLE 3.
Quality assessment of studies
| Author, date | Country | Article type | Study analysis | JBI Quality Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aijaz et al. 2018 27 | UK | Poster abstract | Cross‐sectional | 5/8 |
| Nimmons et al. 2018 25 | UK | Article | Qualitative | 8/10 |
| Reico‐Saucedo et al. 2018 20 | UK | Published report | Qualitative | 8/10 |
| McKelvie et al. 2019 21 | UK | Poster abstract | Cross‐sectional | 5/8 |
| Arakawa et al. 2020 19 | Australia | Article | Cross‐sectional | 7/8 |
| Donoghue et al. 2020 23 | Ireland | Article | Cross‐sectional | 6/8 |
| Hesselink et al. 2020 22 | Netherlands | Article |
Qualitative Cross‐sectional |
6/10 8/8 |
| Dowell et al. 2021 26 | UK | Poster abstract | Cross‐sectional | 4/8 |
| Kotsani et al. 2021 24 | Greece | Article | Cross‐sectional | 6/8 |
Note: Scoring: Cross‐sectional critical appraisal checklist: minimum score of 1, maximum score of 8 indicating well‐conducted cross‐sectional study. Qualitative research critical appraisal checklist: minimum score 1, maximum score of 10 indicating well‐conducted qualitative research.
Abbreviations: JBI, Johanna Briggs Institute; UK, United Kingdom.