Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 18;131(1):116–124. doi: 10.1111/bju.15842

Table 2.

NK‐cell infiltration.

Intention‐to‐treat Baseline Follow‐up Within‐Group change Between‐Group difference
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Change (95% CI) P Difference (95% CI) P
NK cells tumour, cells/mm2
EX 1.51 (1.86) 1.86 (1.50) 0.35 (−0.67 to 1.36) 0.489 −0.09 (−1.85 to 1.66) 0.913
CON 1.05 (1.37) 1.49 (1.17) 0.44 (−0.99 to 1.88) 0.534
NK cells healthy, cells/mm2 *
EX 2.37 (3.33) 2.24 (2.12) −0.13 (−1.87 to 1.62) 0.884 1.75 (−1.34 to 4.84) 0.255
CON 4.15 (4.50) 2.26 (1.59) −1.88 (−4.43 to 0.67) 0.142
Per‐protocol Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Change (95% CI) P Difference (95% CI) P
NK cells tumour, cells/mm2
EX 0.47 (0.48) 2.07 (1.65) 1.60 (0.59 to 2.62) 0.004 1.16 (−0.31 to 2.63) 0.114
CON 1.05 (1.37) 1.49 (1.17) 0.44 (−0.62 to 1.50) 0.396
NK cells healthy, cells/mm2 *
EX 0.62 (0.78) 1.95 (1.48) 1.33 (−0.82 to 3.48) 0.210 3.23 (0.07 to 6.38) 0.046
CON 4.15 (4.50) 2.26 (1.59) −1.90 (−4.21 to 0.42) 0.102

Means (SDs) are based on all available data for EX and CON at baseline and follow‐up with intention‐to‐treat (EX, n = 20 and CON, n = 10) and per‐protocol (EX, n = 11, and CON, n = 10) analysis. The mean differences are estimated means from the mixed models and therefore, within‐group change may not reflect the numerical difference between baseline and follow‐up.

Bold values statistically significant at P < 0.05.

*

The analyses in healthy tissue are based on CON, n = 9 at baseline due to lack of normal tissue in core needle biopsy.