Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 25;21(1):77–94. doi: 10.1111/idh.12597

TABLE 6.

Meta‐analysis for the Papillary Bleeding index using a random model

Papillary Bleeding index Number of comparisons Comparison Effect size Heterogeneity Online appendix number
DiffM 95% CI p‐Value I 2 p‐Value Forrest plot Funnel plot TSA
Number TSA does research the RIS or not (yes/no)

Robinson et al. (1997) 49

Schmickler et al. (2016) 70 2x

Schmalz et al. (2017‐AJD) 71

Schmalz et al. (2018‐COI) 73 2x

6 Baseline 0.05 (−0.04; 0.15) 0.28 29% 0.22 S12A NA NA NA
End −0.08 (−0.18; 0.02) 0.13 55% 0.05 S12B NA S12C No
Difference ? ? ? ? ? NA NA NA NA

Note: p‐Values are presented in bold if p ≤ 0.05.

Abbreviations: ?, Unclear; NA, Not applicable; RIS, Required Information Size; TSA, Trial sequential analysis.