Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 25;21(1):77–94. doi: 10.1111/idh.12597

TABLE 7.

Meta‐analysis for the Angular Bleeding index/ Bleeding On Marginal Probing using a fixed model

Angular Bleeding index/Bleeding On Marginal Probing Number of comparisons Comparison Effect size Heterogeneity Online Appendix number
DiffM 95% CI p‐Value I 2 p‐Value Forrest plot Funnel plot TSA
Number TSA does research the RIS or not (yes/no)

Putt et al. (2001) 53

Van der Weijden et al. (2002–1) 54

Rosema et al. (2005) 57

3 Baseline 0.00 (−0.06; 0.07) 0.93 0% 0.77 S13A NA NA NA
End 0.09 (0.03; 0.14) 0.003 40% 0.19 S13B NA S13C no
Difference ? ? ? ? ? NA NA NA NA

Note: p‐Values are presented in bold if p ≤ 0.05.

Abbreviations: ?, Unclear; NA, Not applicable; RIS, Required Information Size; TSA, Trial sequential analysis.