Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 27;42(2):487–496. doi: 10.1002/jum.15991

Table 4.

Cutoff Values for B‐Mode Ratio to Rule‐In and Rule‐Out Steatosis in a Cohort of 137 Patients With ALD and NAFLD

Cutoff Value Sensitivity (%) (95% CI) Specificity (%) (95% CI) PPV (%) (95% CI) NPV (%) (95% CI) Correctly Classified (%)
≥S1
Optimal 1.46 48 (38–59) 100 (88–100) 100 (92–100) 37 (26–49) 60
Rule‐out 1.09 91 (84–96) 43 (25–63) 85 (76–91) 60 (36–81) 80
Rule‐in 1.45 51 (40–61) 96 (82–100) 98 (89–100) 37 (26–49) 61
≥S2
Optimal 1.48 64 (49–77) 85 (74–92) 74 (59–87) 77 (66–86) 76
Rule‐out 1.21 90 (78–97) 44 (32–56) 53 (42–64) 86 (71–95) 63
Rule‐in 1.67 38 (25–53) 90 (81–96) 73 (52–88) 67 (57–77) 69
=S3
Optimal 1.39 86 (65–97) 60 (49–69) 32 (21–46) 95 (87–99) 64
Rule‐out 1.34 91 (71–99) 55 (44–65) 31 (20–43) 96 (88–100) 61
Rule‐in 1.92 18 (5–40) 91 (83–96) 31 (9–61) 83 (75–90) 78

Optimal cutoff by Youden Index. Rule‐out and rule‐in cutoff chosen based on sensitivity and specificity above 90% respectively.