Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 10.
Published in final edited form as: Neurocrit Care. 2022 Mar 14;37(Suppl 2):322–327. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01470-x

Table 3.

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each set of models

Model Type CAV (95% CI) CAV+ (95% CI) P for comparison
Logistic Regression 0.72 (0.61–0.82) 0.73 (0.62–0.83) 0.8
Lasso Regression 0.69 (0.58–0.80) 0.77 (0.68–0.85) 0.02
Support Vector Machines 0.50 (0.50–0.50) 0.52 (0.38–0.67) 0.8
Random Forest 0.70 (0.60–0.80) 0.78 (0.68–0.88) 0.2
Xgboost 0.72 (0.62–0.82) 0.79 (0.71–0.87) 0.04

CAV: cortical hematoma, age <65 years, volume >10mL; CAV+: CAV variables plus anti-platelet use, anti-coagulant use, Glasgow Coma Scale, international normalized ratio on admission, systolic blood pressure