Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr;44(4):474–480. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7834

Table 2:

Treatment parametersa

Parameters
Aneurysms treated in the respective treatment session 1 2 3 4
144 (89.4%) 13 (8.1%) 2 (1.2%) 2 (1.2%)
Ease of deploymentb Very poor Poor Intermediate Good Very good
0 (0%) 1 (0.6%) 1 (0.6%) 12 (7.5%) 147 (91.3%)
Vessel wall appositionb Very poor Poor Intermediate Good Very good
0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (1.2%) 8 (5.0%) 151 (93.8%)
Radiopacityb Very poor Poor Intermediate Good Very good
0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 59 (36.7%) 102 (63.4%)
Performance compared with FRED/FRED Jrb Worse Slightly worse Equivalent Slightly better Better
0 (0%) 0 (0%) 154 (96.3%) 6 (3.8%) 0 (0%)
Additional coiling 48 (29.8%)
In-stent balloon angioplasty 4 (2.5%)
a

Data are absolute number of cases (relative frequency in %).

b

Rated as an overall score for each treatment (not for each implanted FD).