Table 2:
Parameters | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aneurysms treated in the respective treatment session | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
144 (89.4%) | 13 (8.1%) | 2 (1.2%) | 2 (1.2%) | ||
Ease of deploymentb | Very poor | Poor | Intermediate | Good | Very good |
0 (0%) | 1 (0.6%) | 1 (0.6%) | 12 (7.5%) | 147 (91.3%) | |
Vessel wall appositionb | Very poor | Poor | Intermediate | Good | Very good |
0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (1.2%) | 8 (5.0%) | 151 (93.8%) | |
Radiopacityb | Very poor | Poor | Intermediate | Good | Very good |
0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 59 (36.7%) | 102 (63.4%) | |
Performance compared with FRED/FRED Jrb | Worse | Slightly worse | Equivalent | Slightly better | Better |
0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 154 (96.3%) | 6 (3.8%) | 0 (0%) | |
Additional coiling | 48 (29.8%) | ||||
In-stent balloon angioplasty | 4 (2.5%) |
Data are absolute number of cases (relative frequency in %).
Rated as an overall score for each treatment (not for each implanted FD).